March 2018 Comment

The Skripal Affair

It’s hard to say what event has dominated the news of March 2018 – there are so many of them. So let’s take it chronologically. On the 4th of March in Salisbury, England, former Russian military intelligence officer and British spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were poisoned with a Novichok nerve agent developed in the former Soviet Union between the 1970s and early 1990s.

Yulia Skirpal is a Russian citizen who was visiting her father, Sergei, who has been a British citizen and living here since 2010. He had been imprisoned in Russia in 2006 for 13 years for treason, having worked for the UK’s Secret Intelligence Service for nine years. He was released after a few years, following the Illegals Program spy swop.

The incident was immediately used by Prime Minister Teressa May and most of the establishment media to mount a diplomatic attack on Russia in general, and on President Putin in particular, who was accused of having personally authorised the attempted murder.

But why would the Russian government want to murder Skirpal in such a convoluted way? And in a way (involving the Novichok nerve agent) that was guaranteed to bring accusations against itself and be used as an excuse by the West to further tighten sanctions? The whole episode has false flag written all over it.

A useful insight into the background of Western hostility to Russia under President Putin can be read here.

Who Orchestrated the Trump Election Win?

The controlled media would have us believe that the Russians manipulated the US 2016 presidential election so as to get Donald Trump into the White House (or, at least, to keep Hillary Clinton out).

But now, at last, it seems the real truth is coming out – that an obscure private company – a data harvesting firm – called Cambridge Analytica had its fingers in that particular pie right up to their armpits.

Data harvesting is a term that has come to the fore in recent years. You can’t go online for long without meeting an attempt to collect your personal data. All the social media companies do it, and most multinationals do it, including, of course, Google and Microsoft.

Until recently such data was used to build profiles of as many individuals as possible in order to target them with advertising that would bring the most profitable results. Now, the next logical step has been taken. And that is to use such data not just for advertising but also for political persuasion. It seems Trump’s campaign used Cambridge Analytica to target people who were deemed sympathetic to his campaign, or at least hostile to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, to actually turn out and vote for Trump.

Trump is popularly represented in the media as just the sort of politician that millions of ordinary Americans support. Bigoted, extreme right wing, even racist up to a point, as his Mexican wall project implies. His “Make America Great Again” theme throughout the campaign hit home with enough voters to see him through.

But Trump is also a globalist and a Zionist. He personally invited the Israeli prime minister, Netanyahu, to attend his inauguration. He has authorised the moving of the US Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv (the capital of Israel) to Jerusalem, as a slap in the face to the Palestinians. He has a Jewish son in law who, while Trump himself is embroilled in the affairs of state until at least 2021, is running the family businesses.

It’s interesting to note that one of the key states that voted Trump in 2016 is Florida, with its large Jewish population. This pattern was repeated in several other states with a large Jewish population. You’d think that, with Trump making all kinds of patriotic noises in his campaign, Jews would overwhelmingly vote against him, but not so. They flocked to vote FOR him. There must be something in it for them, or for Israel, and not just the relocation of the US Embassy.

It wasn’t just Jews at the bottom who played a key part in Trump’s election. It was those at the top as well. This brings us back to Cambridge Analytica. Their CEO is someone called Alexander Nix. Nix has boasted that he can employ “Israeli companies” to collect intelligence on politicians that Cambridge Analytica is paid to slander, defame and entrap.

So it seems that if any foreign power can be justly accused of meddling in the US election, it isn’t Russia. It’s more likely to be Israel. Read more about the unfolding Cambridge Analytica scandal here.

Brexit Under Attack

Since the Brexit victory of June 2016 the enemies of national independence and freedom have re-grouped and launched one attack after another in a desperate attempt to have the result declared unlawful or reversed by way of a second referendum or a general election.

Their latest attempt is to have the result declared invalid on account of illegal activities having been indulged in by Vote Leave, one of the main organisations that worked for a pro-Brexit result.

One person maintaining a high profile in this manouver is Christopher Wylie, who used to be Director of Research at… Cambridge Analytica. He recently spilled the beans on how that firm had “harvested data” (ie stolen personal details of individuals) from 50 million Facebook users.

As I’m writing this he is giving evidence to the UK’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, and alleging that the questionable, possibly illegal, activities of Cambridge Analytica, which had been retained by the Vote Leave campaign in 2015-16, may well have swayed the result of the referendum.

And what illegal activities did the Pro-Remain organisations get up to? How much did they overspend by? The Remain campaign set up five pro-remain groups in the closing weeks of the campaign and funnelled £1 million to them, according to some reports. If that’s correct then it puts all the allegations against Vote Leave in the shade. But right now the Commons are having a two hour debate on allegations that Vote Leave (and Vote Leave alone?) broke election spending rules in the referendum campaign. Read more about all the accusations and counter-accusations here.

Brexit is under seige. We must hold out for the referendum result to stand at all costs.

March 2018 Digest

Some of the best items we have seen on the Net in January and February 2018

Israel orders African refugees to leave country within three months or face prison - The Independent

Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, calls them ‘infiltrators’

Meanwhile, here’s what these Jews want to do to us. One law for them, another one for non-Jews.

Engineer behind anti-diversity memo sues Google - The  Daily Telegraph

Following on from that –
19 insane tidbits from James Damore’s lawsuit about Google’s office environment The Federalist
Employees were allowed to award those who spoke out against Damore’s memo ‘peer bonuses’ monitored by the ‘Google Recognition Team’. Read more here.

The first stirrings of resistance from Italy?
‘Italy first’? Right-wing politician vows to kick out 100k migrants per year if elected PM. Russia Today reports.

…which leads us to a Wall Street Karma article concerning how the Italians are being dispossessed from their own country – [Since it was published, the original page has been removed. A search on site for ‘incredible shrinking population’ and ‘Italians will be a minority’ brought back no result. Try it for yourself and draw your own conclusions.] Click here to see the text of this article.

Now for something we’ve all thought about at some time…

Are modern Jews really the descendants of Biblical Jews?
Trashing the Torah: Justice, Freedom and Israel’s Assault on Jewish Values
by Tobias Langdon in the Occidental Observer.

The real enemy is having to show itself – from the Daily Telegraph.
George Soros, the man who ‘broke the Bank of England’, backing secret plot to thwart Brexit

Funny how our ancestors never had any aid agencies collecting for them.
England and the only bootstrapped Industrial Revolution
by Robert Henderson and published on his England Calling blog at

Labour treachery revealed –
Labour Shows Its True Colours

Venezuelan blow against Wall Street hegemony –
The Venezuelan “Petro” – Towards a New World Reserve Currency?
Peter Koenig and Global Research

The Incredible Shrinking Population

The Incredible Shrinking Population: By 2080 Italians will be a minority in their own nation

Wall Street Karma [Since it was published, the original page has been removed. A search on site for ‘incredible shrinking population’ and ‘Italians will be a minority’ brought back no result. Try it for yourself and draw your own conclusions.]

[MW file note: I have broken up some of the over-long paragraphs in this article and Anglicised some of the spelling.]

Though the official data shows that Italy’s population was growing until 2015 and according to a Eurostat projection it will stabilise within the next [few] decades, the number of indigenous citizens is shrinking with an astonishing pace: every year by a quarter of a million, and this decline will accelerate.

That means that the projected demographic growth can only be achieved by mass migration from Africa and Central Asia. Currently most migrants in Italy are from Romania but that number is declining rapidly.

There will be less and less migration from other European countries because all European nations are in a dramatic demographic decline and because due to the prolonged Italian economic crisis the country is not a prime destination for people from other European states.

Europe Faces African Invasion

If the official Eurostat forecast is correct, then within 60 years or, taking into consideration the current pace of migration even sooner, 50% of Italy’s inhabitants will be of African or Asian descent.

The figures found by our demographic-research team are by far not unique and government statisticians have the same numbers. Not only are the Italian and European authorities fully aware of this, but they seem to be executing a re-population program on such a monumental scale that will dwarf the Swedish mass migration experiment.

The Italian fertility rate (of indigenous and naturalized female citizens), i.e. the number of children per woman, is 1.34, which is far below the replacement level of 2.1. Much the same is true of the whole European continent. In this respect Europe resembles Japan.

The difference is that while the Japanese authorities expect the country’s population to decline by a stunning 60% by the end of this century, the European governments predict a population growth. Why is that so?

Replacing Europeans with Africans

The answer is simple. The European leaders have opted for replenishing their nations with migrants whereas their Japanese counterparts have not. The Tokyo authorities refuse to replace their people with aliens, knowing full well that in the long run such a step would mean that Japan will only continue to exist in name.

To get a better understanding of the demographic development in Europe, the Gefira team has developed software for population simulation, called Cerberus 2.0. The programme is fed with millions of records provided by Eurostat and National Statistic Agencies of different European member-states.

For Italy, Cerberus 2.0 began its simulation with the 1985 population level, which is the first year for which a complete database concerning death and fertility rates is available.

To calculate the population of the subsequent years, Cerberus 2.0 increased the age of all groups. The program uses the age-specific fertility and death rates for each year. The number of newborns can be calculated from the age-specific fertility rate multiplied by the number of women in each year.

The programme can determine very precisely how many newborns there are and how many people die in each age-group. Demographic prediction without migration is the most precise forecast and leaves us with little uncertainty about the plight of the Italian nation.

Starting with the year 1985, Cerberus 2.0 calculated that in 2016 Italy should have numbered 55 million people. Yet, according to Istat, the Italian National Institute of Statistics, there were 60 million inhabitants, which means that 5 million of them were immigrants. This fact was both admitted by Istat and predicted by our software.

Forecasting Future Population Trends

For the predictions after 2016 Cerberus 2.0 uses the fertility and death rates from 2016. This simulation gives a very accurate estimation of the future Italian population.

Without a drastic change in the attitude to family life and reproduction in Western society, the fertility rates of native Europeans will not increase. A relative high number of children per family in some European countries are due to (especially) first generation immigrants.

For example the overall (indigenous and immigrant) fertility rate in the Netherlands is 1.67 while the fertility rate of the women born in the Netherlands is a meagre 1.5.

Life expectancy will not change significantly the overall demographic picture. The death rate for the cohort of people aged up to 65 in Western countries is so low that improvements in this respect are hardly possible. Life expectancy of seniors can increase a little, but that will not affect the growth of a population in any significant way. Fertility generally ends at the age of 55.

Demographers know precisely the future of the western native populations, and yet there is little or no academic debate about their looming extinction.

Illusion versus Reality

There is a large group of social scientists who cling to the belief (and that’s the right word for it) that migrants from Morocco, Congo or Zimbabwe will absorb the Italian culture and blend into the Italian nation.

The common reply to critics of immigration policies is that ”problems will disappear after the second generation” or that “it will be like the US” where there are Italian-Americans, Chinese-Americans, African-Americans and so on.

In other words, within one or two generations the new black Italians will behave as Italians, and no difference will be noticeable apart from their dark skin colour. A different opinion, based on tangible evidence, is deemed racist and treated accordingly.

The discussion in “polite society” is focused on the size and speed of migration and the integration of the arrivals. Like it was in Galileo’s days, the believers have the upper hand over those who adduce observation and facts.

The future US is not going to resemble the past US: the present US is already in the process of change. And yet, problems do not “disappear after two generations”. France, which now has the third generation of third-world immigrants, faced ethnic riots over a decade ago, with the then President Sarkozy labelling the North African rioters “scum”.

Such conflicts can never be ironed out. Cultural clashes between Catholics and Protestant migrant communities in the US weren’t uncommon, yes, but they never evolved into the regular outbreaks of Islamic terrorism we are seeing in Europe today.

Immigrants to the US were also never expected to benefit from a developed welfare system equivalent to the ones we have in Europe nowadays. Mark Faber, a Swiss investor, was removed from many public functions for his remark that if Africans had founded America, the USA would look like Africa.

While this seems a truism for ordinary people, the investor was forced to apologise by the politically correct community, high minded academics and journalists. Any person who believes mass migration from Africa will change the face and soul of the nation is labeled a racist.

With zero immigration and the current birth rate Cerberus 2.0 predicts that in 2080 the Italian population will be reduced to about 27 million people and in 2100 it will be further reduced by 60% to 20 million, which is the same result as the Japanese statisticians predict for Japan.

Conspiracy of Silence

Surely, the renowned economists, policymakers, and trend forecasters are aware of such a drastic change in Western societies – or are they?

Despite these data, the Italian government and Eurostat expect that by 2080 there will be 53 to 60 million inhabitants in Italy. This can only be true if the indigenous population is replenished with 25 to 30 million first-generation migrants and their offspring from Africa or Asia.

Even if migration does not accelerate, the Italians will be a minority by 2080. If we consider the migration rate of the last five years, this can happen even sooner.

While the general public is unaware of its fate, top policy-makers know the numbers. German, Spanish, Norwegian, Irish and Dutch NGOs as well as the European Navy [MW asks: “European Navy”?? There is no such thing (yet). ‘Navies of European nations’, perhaps.] have ferried a shocking 600 thousand non-Western migrants from Libya to Italy since 2014. This has been done with the full complicity of the current Italian authorities.

The grand replacement is no accident nor is it intended to be stopped. It is a well designed, devious programme without the European natives having a say.

[MW comments: Surprising there is no reference to George Soros, the Hungarian Jewish billionaire and his NGO ‘Open Borders’ which has been behind the promotion of non-European immigration into Europe, among many other subversive projects in Europe — and globally.]