The war on White people. News and comment on the campaigns and movements active in attempting to bring about the genocide of the White race. This comprises in particular immigration and mass migration of non-Whites into White countries, the concept of ‘multi-racialism’ or ‘multiculturalism’ and the incessant campaign in the mass media for Whites to accept that it is natural and inevitable for mixed-race births to occur.
Bill Baillie, the editor of Nation Revisited, has had his web site sabotaged by the likes of Google. He has asked that Anglo-Celtic.org re-publish the material that Google has objected to, and in the interests of freedom of expression we are pleased to do so. The following article relates to a BBC Television history-rewriting exercise in the form of a highly ficticious, extreme left-wing slanted drama called "Ridley Road", broadcast in the autumn of 2021.
I posted Martin Websterâ€™s article on my blog European Outlook but it was taken down by Google for violating their Community Guidelines. I thank Anglo-Celtic for defending free speech.
The information you mention from Mike Whine, a one-time ‘Defence Director’ of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, to the effect that the creation of the Jewish terrorist ’62 Group’ was prompted by the National Socialist Movement’s violent attacks on sundry Jewish and Israeli organisations in the UK is utter tosh.
This invention was surely provided to cover for gratuitous Jewish violence, indeed terrorism, by the 62 Group gang who were inspired by the Zionist terrorist group the Irgun and mobilised, among others, by Soho club owner and gangster Harry Bidney.
I have never heard of the Jewish/Israeli organisation which Whine specified – and I have been taking the Jewish Chronicle for most of my adult life. I certainly never heard those names mentioned in the (very small) membership circles of the NSM – let alone where their HQs were, let alone plans to attack them.
During my time in the NSM (mid-1962 to late-1963) the NSM was too preoccupied staging publicity stunts such as:
The “Free Britain from Jewish Control” rally in Trafalgar Square in July 1962. No more than 15 NSM members were present at this, confronted by about 2,000 Jews! My attendance got me expelled from the League of Empire Loyalists and so I migrated to the NSM.
Later that month smuggling the American Nazi Party leader Lincoln Rockwell into the UK contrary to a government banning order.
Ending that month, the ‘Camp in the Cotswolds’, attended by no more than 20 NSM members, along with two or three Germans, the strange Anglo-Greek , Hinduism convert, “NS philosopher” Savitri Devi – and Lincoln Rockwell.
These stunts infuriated the government – to say nothing of Jewry! – so the NSM was still rewarded with a Police raid on its Notting Hill, west London, HQ. The prosecution of the movement’s leadership (Colin Jordan, John Tyndall, Ian Roland Kerr-Ritchie and Denis Pirie) followed soon after on Public Order Act charges to do with running a private army. They were found not guilty of doing this, but guilty of “giving reasonable apprehension” that they were! They were sentenced, variously, to between three and nine months in jail.
During this period the membership of the NSM, such as it was, melted away. The movement’s HQ, now my habitation, was left in my charge (a 19 year old!) Nocturnal attacks on the building were frequent. Only two or three supporters ever called by – one of whom, decades later – was identified at his funeral by a retired Police officer as a former salaried agent of MI6!
The reason why I give this brief 1962/1963 history of the NSM is to illustrate that the leadership was too swept up by events to contemplate, let alone organise, the kind of terrorism alleged by Mike Whine, and that the membership was so vanishingly small and so quickly scattered to the winds, that there were no ‘soldiers’ available to carry out such attacks – which, to the best of my recollection, were not reported by the media at that time.
John Tyndal, Denis Pirie and I quit the NSM in late 1963 in order to set up the Greater Britain Movement. We left the NSM in the hands of Colin Jordan and his newly-married French wife FranÃ§oise Dior. Thereafter, Jordan tended to spend his time in the North Yorkshire moors, while she took charge of the London HQ.
Under her influence (so it was claimed in court) a couple of silly teenage lads attempted in 1964 to burn down two synagogues. They failed and along with Mrs Jordan, they were jailed. That is the nearest the NSM ever came to acts of terrorism. Nothing remotely of the order alleged by Mike Whine and – NB! – more than two years after the 62 Group was deploying its cosh, razor and fire-bomb activities.
Mike Whine’s pretext for the formation and vicious gangster activities of the 62 Group does not bear scrutiny. That, of course, will not have deterred the BBC from basing a TV series on such mendacity. You, Philip Gegan and I have discovered the enormity of the BBC’s appetite for lies when we came to complain about a BBC Radio 4/BBC Sounds series ‘about’ the National Front – in particular, the August 1977 “Battle of Lewisham”.
British Politicians, Police and Feminists Are Guilty of Systemic Rapism. That is the serious charge laid by the author of this post, originally published by The Occidental Observer and written by Tobias Langdon. The scandal of the Pakistani-Muslim run child sex slave rackets that have grown up in dozens of British towns and cities, not all of them in the north, is something that the establishment still seeks to suppress. Politically motivated mostly Labour-run local councils, Police Commissioners, and the mainstream media all turn a blind eye to the criminal exploitation of young, vulnerable White children, who have no-one to protect them, at the hands of ruthless, inhumane and unimaginably cruel Asian migrants.
In the year 2000, the small Yorkshire town of Rotherham was little-known in Britain, let alone overseas. In 2020, Rotherham is infamous around the world as a place where Pakistani rape-gangs have been raping, prostituting and murdering working-class White girls for decades. Meanwhile, the staunchly socialist and fiercely feminist Labour council and Labour MP, Denis MacShane, helped the rapists by either ignoring their crimes or actively suppressing news of what was going on.
In other words, Rotherham was the scene of systemic rapism, that is, of systemic collusion by politicians, police and feminists in an engrained Pakistani culture of rape and misogyny. But although the Rotherham rape-gangs are now world-infamous, a very important question about their activities has barely been asked by the British media. To see what that question is, letâ€™s look at a simple allegory that even leftists should be able to understand. Suppose that next week a British journalist comes across a small lake in Yorkshire called Rotherpool and discovers that left-wing ecologists began enriching it in the 1950s by introducing piranhas to its boringly bland waters. Anyone who objected to the piranha-enrichment on behalf of native fish was accused of vile speciesism and sternly lectured that all fish are the same under the scales.
The journalist investigates further and discovers that, sure enough, the piranhas have been preying savagely on native fish right since their introduction. Meanwhile, left-wing ecologists and fish-wardens helped the piranhas by either ignoring their predation or actively suppressing news of what was going on. The journalist does his job, informs the British public, and a scandal erupts about the ecological disaster visited on Rotherpool. But that isnâ€™t the end of the scandal. There are much bigger lakes elsewhere in Yorkshire: Sheffmere, Bradwater and Lake Leeds. The journalist and his colleagues naturally investigate whether piranha-enrichment has been going on there too. Indeed it has and the journalists discover that even bigger ecological disasters have taken place in those bigger lakes â€” and in truly giant lakes elsewhere in Britain.
The allegory is ridiculous, of course: leftists would never introduce dangerous alien species like piranhas into British lakes. And they certainly wouldnâ€™t pretend that all fish are the same under the scales and that â€œspeciesâ€ isnâ€™t a valid scientific concept. Leftists arenâ€™t irrational, stupid and malign people, after all. They donâ€™t want to cause or conceal horrendous unnecessary suffering. At least, they donâ€™t when it comes to important native creatures like fish. But when it comes to unimportant native creatures like the White working-class, leftists are happy to both cause and conceal suffering on an endless and industrial scale.
The point of the allegory should be obvious even to leftists. For â€œpiranhas,â€ read â€œPakistanis.â€ For â€œlakes,â€ read â€œtowns and cities.â€ It wasnâ€™t just the small town of Rotherham that experienced a Pakistani-enrichment programme. Big cities in Yorkshire like Leeds, Sheffield and Bradford did too. So an obvious â€” and almost unaddressed â€” question arises from the Rotherham scandal. If Pakistanis have been behaving so badly in a small town, what have they been doing in big cities nearby? And what have they been doing in even bigger British cities like London, Manchester and Birmingham?
Only Non-White Lives Matter
The British media havenâ€™t been been trying to answer this question, but in fact the answer is already known. The Rotherham scandal was horrific, but much worse things have been happening elsewhere in Britain. Rape-gangs of Pakistanis and other non-Whites have been operating with the complicity not just of supposed feminists in the Labour party but also of the police. Letâ€™s take the big city of Manchester, where a policewoman called Maggie Oliver worked on an investigation into child sex-abuse called Operation Augusta, which began sixteen years ago in 2004. As Maggie Oliver witnessed at first hand, senior officers werenâ€™t serious about ending child sexual abuse. And unlike many thousands of her tough male colleagues who witnessed the same thing both in Manchester and elsewhere, Oliver wasnâ€™t prepared to be complicit in what she calls â€œgross criminal neglect and misfeasance in public officeâ€ by those senior officers.
So she resigned from the Greater Manchester Police, campaigned for the victims, and was instrumental in exposing the so-called Rochdale scandal, in which White working-class girls in the small town of Rochdale had been raped and prostituted by Pakistani men. Nine Pakistanis were convicted, but they represented a new leftist adaptation of an old legal strategy. Youâ€™ve heard about specimen charges, selected when a criminal has committed too many offences for a court to deal with speedily and efficiently. The nine Pakistanis in Rochdale were specimen defendants, selected because a â€œcommunityâ€ contained too many criminals for the authorities to charge without embarrassment.
A nationwide problem
In truth, not just dozens, not just hundreds, but thousands of Pakistani men should be prosecuted and imprisoned for the sex-crimes they have committed against White girls and women in Brave New Britain. This is what Maggie Oliver wroteÂ in 2020:
Operation Augusta engaged with other British police forces and we soon realised there was a nationwide problem, where in other cities and areas, including Liverpool, West Yorkshire, Bradford, Keighley, Birmingham and Bristol, young girls were being groomed and then raped by predominantly Pakistani men. Some examples of this were broadcast in the documentary by Dispatches, titled â€˜Edge of the Cityâ€™, in August 2004. Subsequent revelations about grooming gangs in other towns and cities such as Rotherham, Telford, Rochdale and Oxford all demonstrated a similar pattern.
By the spring of 2004, I had a detailed list of 207 men who we believed had abused at least 26 young girls. I recall that these men were all Asian. I am certain that these numbers are a massive underestimation of the true scale of child abuse. I know this because the numbers were strictly ring-fenced by the Greater Manchester Police as they did not wish for the investigation to escalate further. (Witness Statement of Margaret Oliver to the Independent Enquiry in Child Abuse, February 2020)
That is from Maggie Oliverâ€™s Witness Statement to a massive â€œIndependent Enquiry in Child Abuseâ€ that was set up in response to such scandals as the repeated and prolonged failure of the authorities to prosecute Greville Janner, a senior Jewish politician and community-leader, on credible charges of raping gentile boys. The Enquiry hasnâ€™t got to Jannerâ€™s case yet or investigated child-abuse among Orthodox Jews. This may be because itâ€™s less an Enquiry than an Unenquiry, designed not to expose the truth but to obscure it. Maggie Oliver has said this about the Enquiry:
There is a massive imbalance in the witnesses, or the participants that have been called, and it meant that the vast majority of the time was being given to those organisations who have failed and still failing victims and survivors of child sexual exploitation and grooming gangs. â€¦ I provided a 58-page witness statement and I wanted to give give evidence to the inquiry, which was denied. â€¦ Forty pages of my statement were deleted, all the statements were hidden behind numbers and symbols on the website. â€¦
You would imagine with a problem identified in the northern towns and cities like Rotherham and Rochdale and Middlesbrough and Halifax, you would have one of those towns included in a public inquiry looking at grooming gangs. Not one was included. So we had an area like Swansea, St Helens, Warwickshire. â€¦ I know this isnâ€™t a historical problem it is going on in every town and city in the north of England. Even now, even today and I have information from this weekend [October 2020]. This is not a historical problem.
Maggie Oliver is right: â€œThe establishment donâ€™t want to hear that truth.â€ And why not? Because the truth contradicts the massive lie at the heart of Britainâ€™s new state religion of minority worship. According to this new religion, the White majority are evil oppressors and non-White minorities are saintly victims.
Thatâ€™s why the quick and relatively painless murder of the Black teenager Stephen Lawrence by a White gang in 1993 has been endlessly re-visited by the national media, while the prolonged and extremely painful murders of the White teenagers Kriss Donald and Mary-Ann Leneghan by non-White gangs in 2005 were long ago forgotten. Just as in the United States, non-Whites commit violent crime against Whites in Britain much more often than the reverse.
Labour donâ€™t care about â€œwhite trashâ€
Non-Whites also commit massive amounts of violent crime against each other. Minority worship makes this problem worse. Like the martyr-cult of George Floyd in America, the martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence has caused thousands of extra deaths in the so-called Black community, because it has made the police ever-more reluctant to enforce the law against non-Whites. But even as the martyr-cult demands that the British police worship non-Whites, it also demands that they neglect the welfare of Whites. Here is Maggie Oliver again, describing how her police colleagues viewed the White victims of Pakistani child-rapists:
Attitudes towards these kids seemed to be ingrained and widespread. They were widely viewed by fellow officers, senior officers and politicians as â€˜white trashâ€™ or the â€˜underclassâ€™. In this new millennium, they were seen as â€˜losersâ€™. As a result, they were left to fend for themselves, which they clearly couldnâ€™t do. (Witness Statement of Margaret Oliver, 2020)
As its name proclaims, the Labour party was founded to serve and defend the White working-class. But in Labour-controlled Manchester, White working-class girls were dismissed as â€˜white trashâ€™ and â€˜underclass.â€™ They were abandoned to the violent predation of Pakistani Muslims, whom the Labour party were not founded to serve and whose presence in Britain has always and overwhelmingly been opposed by the White working-class.
Rich Jewish lawyers
This betrayal by Labour is a scandal far greater and far more prolonged than the â€œanti-Semitismâ€ that supposedly blighted the party under Jeremy Corbyn. As I pointed out in â€œLabourâ€™s Shame,â€ Jews in Britain are not being raped, prostituted, murdered and ethnically cleansed with the encouragement and complicity of the Labour party. Jews are a rich overclass in Britain, not the victims of decades of violent crime and official neglect. But the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) rides to battle against Labour on behalf of Jews, not of behalf of Whites. The EHRCâ€™s concern for Jews and not for Whites is entirely predictable, given that the EHRC is headed by two rich Jewish lawyers, Rebecca Hilsenrath and David Isaac.
The EHRC is not interested in genuine crimes and genuine suffering. Instead, it is interested in protecting Jewish power and privilege, and in extending the scope and fanaticism of minority-worship. Thatâ€™s why the EHRC wonâ€™t be calling on Maggie Oliver to describe what she witnessed in Manchester after taking leave to nurse her terminally ill husband:
When I returned in September 2005 I found that theinvestigations [into child-sex abuse] had been closed down. I found that rather than investigating, arresting and prosecuting the serial sexual offenders for the multiple rapes that had been perpetrated against dozens of young girls in Manchester, elements of the Greater Manchester Police were instead just warning the abusers under the Child Abduction Act and allowing them to evade justice. â€¦ I believe that a link to this might have been the July 2005 (â€˜7/7â€™) bombings in London, in which 52 people were killed by home-grown terrorists using explosive devices on public transport in the capital. Race relations were very fractious as a result, and there was hesitancy, I felt, from the police to take any steps that might inflame racial tensions â€” including investigating widespread abuse by predominantly Pakistani men.
My gut feeling at the time was that the young victims of sexual abuse in Manchester were overlooked, partly because of their class background, and dismissed as â€˜slagsâ€™ or â€˜slappersâ€™ and â€˜child prostitutesâ€™ (a term I utterly reject â€” no child can consent to be a â€˜prostituteâ€™). There were also no parents to fight for these children, as they were all already in the care system. They did not have a voice and the government and senior authorities within the Greater Manchester Police were not listening. The term often used was that the child victims were making â€œa lifestyle choice.â€
I feel that the closing down of Operation Augusta in 2005 was a travesty and a missed opportunity for the Greater Manchester Police to prevent so much abuse that would later take place. I believe that had they pressed ahead and prosecuted more people implicated in Augusta we would have caught the abusers at the centre of the Operation Span inquiry. I believe that the senior officers who made the decision to close Operation Augusta are guilty of gross criminal neglect and misfeasance in public office. (Witness Statement of Margaret Oliver, 2020)
In its scale, the abuse in Manchester has plainly been much worse than the abuse in Rotherham. But there has been no scandal about what has gone on in Manchester â€” and is still going on. And there have also been no scandals about abuse in London and Birmingham, Britainâ€™s largest and second-largest cities, which have been enriched by non-White predators just as Manchester has.
Fighting antisemitism, ignoring rape and murder
Why no scandals about abuse in these big cities? Maggie Oliver has answered that: â€œThe establishment donâ€™t want to hear [the] truth.â€ And recall these other words in her witness statement: the White working-class victims â€œdid not have a voice.â€ But the Labour party that controls Manchester was founded precisely to give the White working-class a voice â€” and a sword and shield to defend itself. In Rotherham, Labour snatched that sword and shield away, and left White working-class girls voiceless as they were preyed on by non-Whites. Meanwhile, the Labour MP for Rotherham, life-long feminist Denis MacShane, was working for Jews in far-off London and chairing an â€œall-party â€¦ inquiry into antisemitism which,â€ he proudly boasts, â€œwas hailed as a model of its kind and changed government policy.â€
But bad as it was, Labourâ€™s betrayal in Rotherham was only a small part of a much bigger betrayal. Much worse has happened in bigger cities not just in Yorkshire but wherever Pakistanis and other predatory non-Whites have been imported against the clearly expressed opposition of the White working-class. And it isnâ€™t just thousands of non-White child-rapists who should be prosecuted, but thousands of treacherous White politicians, officials, academics and journalists, from prime ministers like Tony Blair and David Cameron on down.
Brave New Britain is built on lies
Blair and Cameron were busy working for the tiny Jewish minority when they should have been working for the White majority. And what happens when the majority loses control of its own nation to a predatory and ethnocentric minority like Jews? You get the partly exposed horrors of Rotherham and the worse but still barely exposed horrors of Manchester, Birmingham, London, Sheffield, Leeds and Bradford. Much worse than Rotherham has happened and is still happening in Britain.
Meanwhile, minority-worship and the martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence continue to control politics, academia and the media. These false new religions insist that Britain is ravaged by the scourge of â€œsystemic racismâ€ against non-Whites. This is a lie. The real racism is against Whites and one symptom of that racism is systemic rapism, or the collusion of politicians, police and feminists in decade after decade of rape committed by non-Whites against Whites. Brave New Britain is built on lies, but those lies will sooner or later crumble. Then the prosecution of traitors like Blair and Cameron can begin.
The Orwellian concept of ‘hate crime’ is here, without any mandate, and our Police Force are enthusiastically supporting it. This is an insidious attack on freedom of expression and must be opposed with all our might. Below is an image of the opening part of the email I recently received as a member of my local Neighbourhood Alert Scheme, together with my reply to them. Any further correspondence relating to it will be published here.
I set out below, for your information, a copy of the letter I sent on 16th October to the Chief Constable.
Dear Mr Cole
â€œHate Crimeâ€ Awareness Week 2020
I write in connection with an email I received this week from Neighbourhood Alert, which I believe is run in conjunction with Leicestershire Police. It invited me to support something called â€œHate Crime Awareness Week 2020â€.
Whilst I support law and order and proper punishments for real crimes, I am not going to support your ridiculous appeal for people to “pledge their support for ‘hate crime’ awareness week”.
The reality is that there is no such thing as a “hate crime”. The attempt to create such an absurdity has only come into existence over the last few years as the assault on our ancient freedoms and liberties by the left has gathered momentum.
Persecuting law-abiding people who express their politically incorrect opinions on Facebook or Twitter is, I suppose, an easier task than taking on hardened criminals who are literally getting away with murder every day.
We have in this country a tradition of freedom of speech that has served us well for hundreds of years, and that we all have a duty to treasure. This freedom has been under attack for several decades, and I for one will not let the madness of “political correctness” destroy it.
My father and grandfather, in their times, marched off to war in the belief that they were defending, among other things, freedom of speech. My uncle gave his life at the age of 25, before I was born, in defending this country from tyranny, and I won’t betray his sacrifice.
Yes, persecuting people for “hate crime” is a form of tyranny. It, together with its twin bastard-brother, “diversity”, is an insidious attack on our very existence as a people and nation. At a time when serious crime and drug offences are spiraling out of control, I am appalled that our own police force, rather than focusing on this horrendous situation, should be virtue-signaling in this way and enthusiastically endorsing the enemies of free speech. I can only suppose that no thought was put into it.
Speaking of thought, I suppose next year you’ll be inviting us to support “Thought Crime Awareness Week”.
Shame on you.
Mr Simon Cole, Chief Constable Leicestershire Constabulary Force HQ St. Johns Enderby Leicester LE19 2BX
Recent reports in the media suggest that Covid-19 has highlighted and emphasised racial differences. Of course, this finding is something that the Cultural Marxists who largely control the media and academia are trying to deny. They try to explain away the disproportionate numbers of Black and Asian victims by citing social and cultural reasons, and by overlooking a vital aspect of the statistics, as explained below.
Before we take a more detailed look at Covid-19 and racial differences, let’s consider a few basic truths.
Pandemics don’t come around very often. That, I suppose, should be a â€œgood thingâ€. After all, nobody wants to get caught up in one. You might die, and that can’t be very good.
But in reality itâ€™s neither a good thing, nor a bad thing. Itâ€™s just part of the facts of life. A reminder that Mother Nature calls the shots. And Mother Nature is much more powerful than anyone else, even humans with nuclear weapons. If you donâ€™t like it, thatâ€™s too bad. If you want to challenge nature, then go right ahead. It wonâ€™t change anything. Live or die. Nature doesnâ€™t care.
One thing before I go any further. You may believe that this Corona virus was manufactured in a laboratory somewhere, whether by the Chinese, the Americans, or anyone else. Thatâ€™s as may be. It doesnâ€™t change the topic I want to discuss, and itâ€™s beyond the scope of this post.
That pandemic has been the subject of many studies over the intervening years, presumably to put humanity in a better position to survive the next one. Sadly, the knowledge gleaned from such studies has not figured prominently in terms of sound knowledge and practical advice to be passed on this time around.
Meanwhile, mass migration has changed the world. No longer does nearly all the worldâ€™s population live in largely homogenous groups. Weâ€™re all â€˜multi-cultiâ€™. At least, those of us who belong to the White race, whose homelands have been invaded over the last 70 years or so by the surplus flotsam of the Third World.
But in this post Iâ€™m not talking about mass migration, as such. Iâ€™m not even talking about the massive brainwashing and propaganda initiatives (1) launched by Zionist media outlets and Marxist professors to enforce acceptance of their sick, multi-racial society.
As a virus, it is a product of nature. Viruses have been around for millions of years, probably pre-dating regular life on earth. We carry, it is said, billions of viruses in our bodies, nearly all of them harmless, or even necessary for our bodies to function properly.
And every so often nature produces a new one. Only this time, it has arrived at a key crossroads in the history of mankind. At a time when the future of the White race is on the line. When the unnatural, artificially constructed multi-racial society is about to impart the final death-kiss to the finest race of people ever to walk the earth.
Nature: â€˜Time to pay up!â€™
If ever there was an abomination, it must be this. The multi-racial society is like a zombie, a creature of the undead, defying all the laws of nature through its very existence, and being kept from fatal collapse only through regular injections of lies, deception, threats, persecution of opponents, and illicit taxpayersâ€™ cash.
You can fool nature, just as a dying man can be given a heart transplant. But your success in doing this is borrowed. Your time is soon up. Then nature comes back and demands the price.
Is this what is happening now? Is this why Covid-19 has appeared on the scene, like an orphaned child, now fully grown, armed and dangerous and bent on avenging his parentsâ€™ murder?
A UK Government-backed study, in July 2020, concluded that South Asian communities living in Britain were at the biggest risk from the corona virus. This was based largely on the findings from a wide-scale testing exercise carried out by Imperial College, London, in May. This found that the prevalence of the virus among Asians was 0.24 per cent, compared to 0.17 per cent among blacks and just 0.13 per cent among native Whites.
Covid-19 is ending the golden age of multi-racialism
This accompanied warnings that there was a â€œrising tideâ€ of infections among â€œdensely populated terraced housesâ€ in North-West England, which has large South Asian communities.
At this time Blackburn had the third highest rate in the country of new cases per week â€“ 47 cases per 100,000 of population (behind Leicester, at 118.2, and Pendle, at 76.6).
It seems these towns have a higher than average (for the north west) percentage of households with five or more occupants. The director of public health for the authority explained the high figures away by saying:
â€œThere is a clustering of cases in larger multi-generational, households in areas characterised by smaller terraced housing.â€
In other words, such households more often than not are occupied by south Asians, and south Asians are particularly prone to catching and being badly affected by the Covid-19 virus. This is a lame attempt to explain away something that cannot be explained inside the â€œall races are equalâ€ bubble, and to which Iâ€™ll return shortly.
At about the same time a Government document was leaked that highlighted the situation in northern towns such as Kirklees, Bradford and Blackburn. These places have been listed as being either of â€œconcernâ€ or needing â€œenhancedâ€ support (i.e. more taxpayersâ€™ money to prop up the unsustainable multi-racial chaos).
The midland city of Leicester (one of the most Asianised cities in Britain) was deemed to be in an even worse situation, and was put into full lockdown for two weeks, while the rest of the country basked in more and more relaxations of the original lockdown restrictions.
Covid-19 targets BAME people
The situation is almost certainly nearly as bad in most other British towns and cities with large Asian and black populations. We cannot know for sure because, according to several reports, many councils are reluctant to publish the figures for their localities for fear of â€œdamaging community cohesionâ€.
In other words, for fear of the White section of the population finding out the real reason why they are being kept in lockdown for so long, losing their jobs, their businesses, their freedoms, and in some cases their sanity.
Meanwhile, the rate of infection among native Whites fell dramatically during May. This is borne out by the data coming from Imperial College, London, referred to above.
Of course, the report doesnâ€™t actually say that. What it does say is that the rate of infection throughout the country was halving every eight to nine days during that month. That can only mean that, with the persistently high rates of infection among the black and Asian populations being included in the figures, the rate for Whites was falling off a cliff.
As weâ€™ve seen, Leicester was leading the way in the number of new cases per 100,000 of population during May. The lockdown for England was announced on 23rd March, and during the first three weeks after that date, something very interesting occurred.
According to academics at the University of Leicester, while rates of infection among Whites â€œdropped off very sharplyâ€ (remaining at no more than 26 per cent), rates of infection among BAME (black, Asian, and other minority ethnics) groups continued to rise, peaking at 50.9 per cent, nearly twice the rate among Whites.
The Cultural Marxist response
So, in essence, in England the Covid-19 virus is impacting BAME people far more than the native White British people. This is very interesting, but even more interesting are the reasons put forward by establishment scientists and doctors.
For example, Dr Manish Pareek is an associate clinical professor in infectious diseases at the University of Leicester. He puts down the stark difference in infection rates to three main factors.
The first is that BAME people â€œwork in front-facing roles and are not necessarily able to work from homeâ€.
So all BAME people work in NHS hospital wards treating Covid-19 patients? I donâ€™t think so.
There are plenty of such people who havenâ€™t played any role whatever in the battle with this virus. And, proportionately, there are probably more Asian people able to work from home than White people.
His second factor is that BAME people â€œmay be part of large, multi-generational households, which increases the rate of infectionâ€.â€† â€†This is similar to what the director of public health at Blackburn said. All it means is that the virus can spread more rapidly within the BAME population groups because many of them live in crowded conditions.
But we’ve been living with Covid-19 for over six months now, and still the rate of infection and, more pertinent, the death rate, among BAME people is far higher than among Whites. Using this logic, Whites would by now be catching up fast, but theyâ€™re not.
And his third factor? That â€œthere may have been issues as to whether the public health messaging actually got through to those populations (due to language and cultural barriers)â€.â€† This, too, is interesting. He is saying that large numbers of Asian people donâ€™t speak or understand English. This is undoubtedly true, especially among older Asians, who on account of their age are more at risk of infection and death.
BAMEs know the risks as well as Whites
But does he really believe that these people are commonly kept in ignorance of vital developments relating to something that may well fatally affect them personally? Do other members of the household (and few of these households have no English speakers at all) not bother to tell them in a language they can understand what the requirements of the lockdown are? And what the risks of defying them are?
Is not a more realistic explanation evident from the photograph shown below, taken recently in Oldham, and showing how Asians tend to ignore social distancing rules?
Itâ€™s not only what you might call â€˜first tierâ€™ racial differences that Covid-19 has kindly highlighted for us, i.e. the biological susceptibility to catching this virus being higher for BAME people than for Whites.
Itâ€™s also the propensity for such people to ignore rules that they donâ€™t like, or that would interfere with their social/cultural activities, even though that disobedience puts them in more danger of catching a potentially fatal disease.
BAME people are not co-operating in combating Covid-19
For example, the current Eid celebrations among Muslims appear to be going ahead, even though social distancing rules are completely ignored at such gatherings. Black/West Indian communities are still mobilising in massive crowds, indoors and out, to enjoy â€˜musicâ€™ activities.
Such activities, moreover, invariably include drug selling and buying, drug taking, alcohol abuse, rioting, looting and stabbings. None of these group activities indicate any concern about avoiding or helping to eliminate Covid-19.
Earlier in July the Daily Telegraph reported that the director of public health for the city of Birmingham had called for an investigation into fears that a major Black Lives Matter protest was responsible for a spike in coronavirus cases in Birmingham.
This week the same newspaper reported as follows:
They never will learn, will they?
Now we hear that the Asian Mayor of Luton, Tahir Malik, breached the lockdown rules by attending a packed garden party with at least twelve other men (all Asians), none of them wearing a mask, two days before the town was upgraded to an â€˜area of interventionâ€™ in response to a flare-up of Covid-19 cases. Here they are, in the photograph below.
In April he had written an open letter praising volunteers and emergency services, stating: â€œSocial distancing is very important in our fight against the virusâ€. Not only is his behaviour irresponsible, but it is also hypocrisy on a staggering scale. He has since resigned as Mayor.
No wonder there are â€˜spikesâ€™ in new cases and death statistics of Covid-19 in the aftermath of such events. The people who stand to have the most severe losses at the hands of the virus are the very people who are doing the least to suppress it.
Mother Nature’s reset
The only conclusion that we can arrive at is that Covid-19 discriminates on a racial basis.
This virus is underlining the fact that races and ethnic groups are not equal at all. No more than all people are equal. Charles Darwin, one of the most learned and impartial observers in the history of science, wrote:
Nearly 200 years later, Covid-19 is proving him right. But the mainstream media, which still has a massive impact on the thinking processes of millions of people, refuses to accept this fundamental truth, as a recent edition of the Daily Mail illustrated (see below).
How can this “inequality” be a scandal? We’ve seen how Covid-19 is potentially more deadly to BAME people than it is to White people. That’s down to a combination of Mother Nature and the propensity of BAME people to behave irresponsibly and not obey the rules designed to minimise the impact of the virus.
The Daily Mail doesn’t complain about other injustices in nature, such as the tendency of snakes to eat small, lovable rodents, or the inability of Australian sheep to run fast enough to escape forest fires (in contrast to birds that can fly away). But then the pointlessness of that would be obvious to anyone.
The truth is that BAME people living in White countries are an unnatural, artificial attachment. In Britain, they do not form part of our country, and nor do we, the majority of White people, want them to. The majority of Asians (as opposed to blacks) donâ€™t want to integrate with us, and nor do we want them to.
Most of them keep their own culture, such as it is. Young Pakistanis still cheer for Pakistan when their cricket team is playing England. It would be natural for them to do so from Lahore rather than Lancashire.
Could it be that Mother Nature has had enough of all this nonsense? That in her clumsy, untidy way she is clearing the decks?
Weâ€™ve heard much lately of how the self-styled Global Elite may be planning a â€œglobal resetâ€ on the back of the virus lockdowns. Perhaps nature herself is gearing up for her own reset, which will sweep away all the grubby little doings of the Zionist â€œeliteâ€, the capitalist parasites and socialist meddlers.
Maybe a better world awaits the survivors on the other side. I for one, even though I may not survive it myself, sincerely hope so.
Enter ‘anti racism initiatives’ (minus the quotes) into any search engine.
2018-2020: Big Tech/ Big Capital/ Big Jew/ Big Brother
A key step towards making dissident thought unlawful, and ensuring â€œSecure Toleranceâ€, is the effort to represent it, in its totality, as culturally illicit. As early as 2015, Brian Marcus, head of the ADLâ€™s Internet Division, had been contacting Internet Service Providers (ISPs) with threats that allowing â€œhateâ€ material on their service â€œwould be bad for their businessâ€.
Backed with reports, policy proposals, and â€œrecommendationsâ€ from their own alphabet soup of think tanks and solo Jewish intellectuals like Cohen-Almagor, the ADL and the European Jewish Congress began more widespread intensive lobbying of tech companies in late 2018. The acceleration of lobbying against Big Tech should be seen in the broader context of heightened activism for the implementation of â€œSecure Toleranceâ€ more generally.
Although the ADL and YouTube had co-operated since at least 2008, intensification of this relationship in early 2019 culminated in YouTube changing its content policy. Jonathan Greenblatt announced the ADL had been
â€œworking with technology companies, including YouTube, to aggressively counter hate on their platforms. We were glad to share our expertise on this and look forward to continuing to provide input. While this is an important step forward, this move alone is insufficient and must be followed by many more changes from YouTube and other tech companies to adequately counter the scourge of online hate and extremismâ€.
The international Jewish strategy to bring the ethos of â€œsecure toleranceâ€ into tech culture again involved the high-level involvement of American Jewish groups in Europeâ€™s â€œdemocraticâ€ institutions.
For example, in May 2015 the American Jewish Committeeâ€™s Transatlantic Institute (note again this constant reliance on a motley of Jewish â€˜think tanksâ€™), launched a fervent lobbying campaign at the EU with the aim to â€œdetoxify social media. â€¦ Internet Service Providers are free to â€” and should â€” exclude raw hate speechâ€.
Just to make sure the message was sent loud and clear, the AJC even hosted its main 2015 â€œStrategy Conference on Combating Anti-Semitismâ€ in Brussels, during which the â€œAJC unveiled an action plan for European governments to address the intensifying crisis of anti-Semitismâ€.
This, then, is our â€œdemocracyâ€ â€” unelected, uninvited American Jewish groups presenting â€œaction plansâ€ (lists of demands) to a bloated, corrupt, and unaccountable bureaucracy.
* * *
Britainâ€™s Jewish â€œCommunity Security Trustâ€ (CST) has, since 2016, been working, again in an unelected and unaccountable capacity, with the European Commission on a â€œsocial media illegal hate speech monitoringâ€ project. The CST was able to use the semblance of official authority given to it by this alliance to pressure social media companies by sending them regular performance reports on how well they were doing in removing CST-blacklisted speech from Twitter, Facebook and Google.
In yet another stellar example of democracy in action, the unelected and unaccountable CST had earlier claimed the credit for developing â€œthe EU Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech onlineâ€. The code was imposed on Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Google+, Snapchat, Dailymotion, and Jeuxvideo.com, following the CSTâ€™s accusation that they were â€œnot adhering to anti-hate speech laws across Europeâ€.
The EU Code of Conduct, however, was only ever intended as the first step towards â€œsecure toleranceâ€, and Moshe Kantor remarked in one 2017 interview that, in his opinion, Big Tech was failing even to meet the basic Jewish expectations of the Code (removal of the majority of designated material within 24 hours).
In a 2017 article for Britainâ€™s Independent, Kantor insisted â€œwe must now look to European political leaders to take stronger action, using legislation if necessary, to prove theyâ€™re serious about combating this problem once and for allâ€. [emphasis added]
The broader push was always for heightened legal measures that would involve law enforcement, as Kantor had himself spelled out in his 2011 Manifesto. Incessant Jewish lobbying has resulted in Germany being the first nation to take the next step to â€œsecure toleranceâ€. Recently, Germany adopted Raphael Cohen-Almagorâ€™s proposal that â€œracismâ€ be treated in the same way as terrorism and child pornography. In February 2020, the German government approved a bill to â€œforce social networks such as Facebook and Twitter to report criminal posts to the policeâ€.
The Financial Times reports:
â€œUnder the planned new law, which is the toughest of its kind in the world, social media platforms will not only have to delete certain kinds of hate speech but also flag the content to the Office of the Federal Criminal Police (BKA). Posts that companies will be required to report include those indicating preparations for a terrorist attack and the formation of criminal and terrorist groups, as well as those featuring instances of racial incitement and the distribution of child pornography. The networks would also have to give the BKA the last IP address and port number most recently assigned to the user profile.â€[emphasis added]
Early resistance from Facebook to the legislation, focused specifically on the issue of â€œHolocaust denialâ€ prompted the ADL to go into attack mode. Reverting to tactics once used against Henry Fordâ€™s Dearborn Independent, the ADL dropped its â€œBoycott is not a solutionâ€ rhetoric that had been employed against the BDS movement, and initiated a â€œStop Hate for Profitâ€ advertising boycott in early June by circulating images showing advertisers anti-Jewish (really, often simply anti-George Soros) Facebook posts alongside which their ads were running. The move shaved almost $58 billion from Facebookâ€™s stock value, with over 1,000 major companies leveraged into action.
ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblattâ€™s series of demands to drop the boycott include the granting of high-level access to â€œcivil rightsâ€ (ADL) officials who will perform â€œregular, independent auditsâ€ of â€œhateâ€ on the platform (which would allow them to engage in intelligence gathering, the collection of IP addresses etc.), immediate removal of â€œthousandsâ€ of White advocacy groups, and the use of Facebook software to â€œtargetâ€ â€œneo-Nazis and White supremacistsâ€.
Simultaneously, the ADL and Moshe Kantor have been pushing a Holocaust-narrative marketing campaign on Facebook, Instagram, and elsewhere, with Kantor commenting â€œThe best way to spread any message today is through social media.â€ Censorship and propaganda thus go hand-in-hand in the effort to gain a monopoly of the public mind.
As the worldâ€™s largest and most influential Jewish organizations tighten their hold on Big Techâ€™s conglomerates, smaller rivals have emerged to fill the dissident demand for platforms. One of the most promising of these is BitChute, a UK-registered technology company with British directors. Slick and easy to navigate, the site is an obvious alternative to those exiled from YouTube, and its growing popularity has frustrated Jews whose goal isnâ€™t simply to remove dissident speech from the larger platforms, but to remove it from the internet, and the public sphere, forever.
Two weeks ago, the CST produced a maudlin propaganda video denouncing BitChute and presenting all dissident thought as â€œincitement to murderâ€. In the course of the video, CST staff announce theyâ€™ve been gathering intelligence at the site and will submit a â€œreportâ€ to their â€œpartners in government, anti-terrorism police, and in think tanksâ€. [emphasis added] The CST has also been concentrating its efforts on Gab, 4chan, and Telegram, and CST Chief Executive Mark Gardner claims that â€œcontact with the policeâ€ has already led to the removal of some content.
The CST recently secured another UK government grant of Â£14 million ($17.66 million), which it has been receiving annually since 2015. In fact, the group is so financially secure that it is now hiring â€œsocial media research analystsâ€ so that it can better put pressure on the government to introduce legislation preventing free speech on the internet. Given that young British people are dying of cancer because the NHS claims to be unable to afford the necessary drugs, it must be a great comfort to their families that at least some Jews, somewhere, are collecting large salaries to browse memes on Twitter and send regular reports to the police about the hate theyâ€™ve found on Gab.
While BitChute has very low advertising revenue, and is thus relatively immune to boycott tactics, Jewish groups have nevertheless attempted to attack other parts of the siteâ€™s infrastructure. In particular, the siteâ€™s reliance on Disqus for video comments has been highlighted as a potential means of weakening the site, with Garner declaring â€œDisqus is part of this problemâ€. One presumes that a warning has been sent.
Online payment processors are another element of internet infrastructure that has been relentlessly attacked by organized Jews. Eric Strikerâ€™s National Justice recently revealed images from a private PayPal seminar in which audience members were told that â€œhate contentâ€ was referred to the ADL, among other â€œexternal partners.â€
â€œAccording to another training slide,1800 accounts belonging to individuals, non-profits and businesses in the last year have been eliminated for political reasons using guidelines provided by their â€˜partnersâ€™. 65% were for what they categorize as white nationalist activity, while the next most censored group is people and organizations who advocate for immigration restrictions. A person cannot support Donald Trumpâ€™s winning issue from his 2016 campaign and still keep their Paypal, in other words. There is even a category for â€˜prejudiced academic workâ€™.â€
PayPal CEO Dan Schulman is himself Jewish, and itâ€™s hard not to conclude that this was a very willing partnership. In fact, Jewish activism in Big Tech collides with another phenomenon â€” what Aaron Chatterji and Michael Toffel refer to in the Harvard Business Review as â€œThe New CEO Activists.â€
Chatterji and Toffel cite Schulmanâ€™s decision not to locate PayPal infrastructure in Charlotte, North Carolina, as CEO activist economic punishment for the stateâ€™s legislation banning the gender-confused from using the bathrooms of the opposite sex. The Associated Press estimated that an ensuing boycott of North Carolina by heavily-Jewish Big Capital cost the state more than $3.76 billion. Salesforceâ€™s Marc Benioff and Goldmans Sachsâ€™s Lloyd Blankfein were similarly listed as â€œCEO activistsâ€ in the cause of advancing homosexuals and their culture.
That the ADL has been able to mobilize a massive and crushing boycott of Facebook is as much a â€œshow of strengthâ€, an act of intimidation against broader industry, government, and people, as it is a specific act against Facebookâ€™s sluggishness in imposing the full list of measures demanded by Big Jew. So-called CEO activism is so very useful to the ADL because so many of the CEOâ€™s are themselves Jewish and highly supportive of the cause. As Fenek Solere pointed out in a recent article for Britainâ€™s Patriotic Alternative, it is almost impossible to separate Big Tech and Big Capital from Big Jew:
Public broadcasting networks both in the UK and USA are â€” and have been for many years â€” effectively owned and dominated by people like
Lew and Leslie Grade and
But it is not only in the spheres of global communication, financial services and party political funding where people like â€¦
Julian A. Brodsky, of Comcast,
Michael Dell of Dell,
Sandy Lerner, co-founder Cisco systems,
Robert A. Altman of ZeniMax Media,
Sergey Brin and Larry Page of Google,
Susan Wojcicki at YouTube,
Sheryl Sandberg, CEO of Facebook,
Aaron Swartz of Reddit,
Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook,
Jeff Weimar at LinkedIn,
Max Levchin of PayPal,
Charles Schusterman of Samson Investment,
Richard and Henry Bloch of the Tax Preparation Company,
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, J Street,
The Zionist Organization of America,
The Republican Jewish Coalition,
and the Christians United for Israel,
â€¦ hold sway.
Some other areas in which they are disproportionately over-represented are:
hotel and leisure,
theatre and the arts,
technology and software,
international intelligence services,
charities and NGOs,
healthcare, professional consultancy
and the legal and judicial profession.
Representative examples being:
Devin Wenig of eBay,
Mark Weinberger CEO/Chairman of Ernst & Young,
Samuel Ruben, Duracell Inc,
Bernard L. Schwartz, CEO of Loral Space & Communication Inc,
Rachel Haurwitz, co-founder of Gene Editing and Caribou Biosciences,
Leonard Schleifer, founder of biotechnology Regeneron Pharmaceuticals,
Beny Alagem, founder of Packard Bell,
Amir Ashkenazi, co-founder of Adap. TV and Shopping.com,
Jay Cohen of Online Gambling,
Talman Marco of Viber,
Sean Pad of Tinder,
Henry Crown, founder of the Material Service Corporation in Aeronautics,
the Mossad run ICTS Europe specialising in international Security,
Gumar Agujar and Armand Hammer of Occidental Petroleum,
Arthur Belfer of Belco Petroleum, precursor to the infamous Enron organisation,
Louis Blaustien of American Oil,
Leon Hess of the Hess Corporation, owners of the NFLâ€™s New York Jets, C,
Morris Mirkin of Budget Rent-a-Car,
Sheldon Yellen of Belfor Construction,
Leonard Abramson of Health Maintenance Organization,
Bennett Greenspan of Gene testing,
Joel Landau of Allure,
Martine Rothblatt of United Therapeutics,
Steve Ballmer of Microsoft,
Ben Rosen of Compaq Computers,
Ivan Seidenberg of Verizon Communications,
Ed Savitz owner of Amusement Arcades,
and Jonathan Tisch, CEO of Loews Hotels.
The above listing is a mere indication of how prolific these power-brokers are and the degree of control they exert over our lives every single day. â€¦ All of them are committed Zionists and all of them are members and supporters of fanatically pro-Israel, Jewish partisan organizations.
And, as I wrote at the conclusion of my 2019 essay â€œThe Necessity of anti-Semitismâ€:
â€œToday, largely worthless â€˜brandedâ€™ consumer products are overwhelmingly Jewish, are promoted via Jewish dominance of the advertising industry, and their purchase by consumers is funded by Jewish financiers.
â€œâ€¦ are just some of the Jews whose very names have become synonymous with debt-fueled consumer culture and the subscribing to carefully cultivated fashion fads, while Jewish-owned companies like â€¦
â€œâ€¦ Starbucks, Macyâ€™s, the Gap, American Apparel, Costco, Staples, Home Depot, Ben & Jerryâ€™s, Timberland, Snapple, HÃ¤agen-Dazs, Dunkinâ€™ Donuts, Monster Beverages, Mattel, and Toys â€˜Râ€™ Us â€¦
â€œâ€¦ have come to epitomize the endless and superfluous production of garbage for mass consumption on credit. The consuming temple of debt-fueled consumerism is also linked to the cultures of Critique, Tolerance, and Sterility. So-called anti-racism, support for gender confusion, and the celebration of mass migration and multiculturalism have become mainstays of modern advertising as the Racial Endgame nears its conclusion and the West commences its death rattle.
â€œYou might ask, when you see rainbow-package Doritos, what tortilla chips have to do with sodomy, but thatâ€™s only because youâ€™re suffering from a tolerance deficiency, and the best way to correct that is to admit White privilege, buy a Starbucks, and go try on a new pair of $200 jeans at Macyâ€™s. Critique, Tolerance, Sterility and Usury have converged. This is the necessity of anti-Semitism.â€
In light of all that has been discussed, we could add that â€œSecure Toleranceâ€, Big Tech, Big Capital, Big Brother, and Big Jew have converged. The final result will be the achievement of Jewish censorship across the West, a â€œpermanent and irreversibleâ€ cycle of laws and repression, and the theft of our childrenâ€™s future. Like Miltonâ€™s Satan, these groups will declaim in favor of equality and democracy, only to later wield the tyrantâ€™s scepter in Hell.
How to finish such a pessimistic essay? Itâ€™s true that the information presented here is disturbing, infuriating, confusing, and heartbreaking. Can any practical lessons be derived from it?
One clear pattern observed in this essay is the overwhelming reliance on â€œthink tanksâ€ and similar bureaucratic vehicles for the intrusion of harmful Jewish influence into our â€œdemocracyâ€. Jews, even with their very significant financial power, rely on the magnification of their rhetoric, interests, and grievances through such bodies in order to accomplish their goals. This is where they can and should be challenged.
Who is granting access and power to these groups? Can existing legislation be used to prevent the intrusion of these bodies into the democratic process and, if not, can new legislation be proposed to do so? The closest the dissident right ever came to a think tank was the National Policy Institute (NPI), which despite its name, and while fulfilling an important movement function, didnâ€™t really produce any policies.
At the present time, our movement clearly needs talented legal minds and institutions to unpack existing legislation, and develop new legislative proposals that, even if not explicitly racial, can seriously hinder the movement of harmful Jewish groups through the political body of the West. There is a serious lack of infrastructure of even the most basic kind, and we simply arenâ€™t going to make any progress until this problem is addressed.
The second lesson from this survey of developments is that social media is likely to become an increasingly compromised and dangerous place for activists. In Europe, new laws are probably a few years away, but the broader plan will almost certainly eventually envelop Canada, Australia, and, despite apparent belief that the Constitution is invulnerable, even the United States. Already American legal scholars have developed arguments for curtailing the First Amendment in the case of â€œhate speechâ€ (see, e.g., Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012), and it is widely believed that a liberal Supreme Court majority would adopt such reasoning.
The clock is probably already ticking on internet anonymity, and the example of Germany indicates that direct police involvement in â€œspeech crimeâ€ is on the horizon. Off-line activist methodologies should be increasingly explored. Failing that, radically alternative modes of using internet networking should be considered. For example, even if someone uses a completely outrageous Twitter handle, complete with comic book avatar, most people still have their entire lives online (job, home town, friends, likes, hobbies, vacations). Donâ€™t forget who ultimately has all of this information, and the organizations that will increasingly be able to access it.
Itâ€™s becoming very apparent that social media is itself a form of social control. We now have the ability to identify someone in a crowd simply by cross-referencing a photo of their face with available internet information. In seconds they can be identified, their employer can be contacted, and their loved ones can be harassed. In a strange way, despite the atomized condition of postmodernity, we have social control levels approaching those of the middle ages. We have new forms of social shaming, and new forms of the public pillory.
Dissident activists who face overwhelming costs if they are doxxed would be well-advised to reduce their internet presence to the bare minimum, in effect, deliberately fading themselves into obscurity, thus making their life harder for the Zionist-Globalist panopticon to search for and penetrate. Remember who you were before you became an employee number, a Facebook profile, or a Twitter handle, and protect that person like youâ€™d protect your child or other loved ones.
For the time being, however, ongoing online activism should be continued with enthusiasm and without despair. This costs our opponents dearly in terms of effort, money, and worry. Each new platform presents difficulties for them to navigate, and delays other plans they may have. Be proud that youâ€™re still active, and be proud that while so many others in life are merely counting passes, you spotted that gorilla.
Iâ€™ll leave the final word to Sir Oswald Mosley:
â€œWe have believed in our fellow Europeans. And we have believed in the destiny of Europe. My friends, itâ€™s all there, itâ€™s all waiting. Of course it can be done. It depends upon ourselves. You say, â€˜But again, weâ€™re scattered individuals. â€¦ Everythingâ€™s against us. Governments. Money. Press. Television. All the new forces are used against us. All the great forces, all the material powers of the world, you say are against you.â€™ And so they are â€” youâ€™re quite right to feel that. And I donâ€™t underrate them.
â€œBut I donâ€™t despair, and you shouldnâ€™t despair. Because you, like I, have read something of history. You know something of the record of the achievement of Europeans. And dark as this hour is, itâ€™s no darker, itâ€™s not as dark, as some of the hours youâ€™ve known in European history. When everything was cowardice, treachery, and betrayal, and when the Saracen hordes from far outside Europe swept right across that continent, small bands of men came together in resolution, in absolute determination, giving themselves completely, and saying: â€˜Europe shall live!â€™
â€œAnd they stood firm, and faced the menace to Europe, its values, its civilisations, the glory of its achievements. And more and more rallied to their standards, and those hordes were thrown back, again and again and again.
â€œMy friends itâ€™s an immense responsibility. Youâ€™re living in a historic hour â€” do remember that always. Live in that sense, I beg of you, of history and of destiny.â€
Come together, get going, get working. Inspire other people like yourselves.
 R. Cohen-Almagor, Confronting the Internetâ€™s Dark Side, (Cambridge University Press, 2015) 219.