This article was first published in Professor Kevin MacDonald’s The Occidental Observer on March 26th, 2010. A link to that site is under ‘Friendly Sites’ to the right of this page. Click here to view to original article at The Occidental Observer.
The assassination was perpetrated by a large hit-squad comprising men and women who arrived and departed Dubai using â€œclonedâ€ passports originally issued to citizens of Australia, France, Germany, Holland, Ireland and the United Kingdom. The Israeli government has refused to comment on the matter beyond stating: â€œThere is no evidence that Israel was responsibleâ€.Twelve of the forged passports were copies of UK originals. It is noteworthy that all of the holders of the authentic UK documents are British citizens who have settled in Israel and who, under the Law of the Return have also taken Israeli citizenship.The Labour governmentâ€™s Jewish (but not necessarily Zionist) Foreign Secretary David Milliband rose to his feet in a hushed House of Commons to make a ministerial statement which announced that following an investigation by Scotland Yardâ€™s Serious and Organised Crime Agency (SOCA), a decision had been taken to require a senior member of the diplomatic staff of the Israeli Embassy in London to quit Britain forthwith.The diplomat was not named in the statement, but it is presumed that the person, whatever his or her official title, is Mossadâ€™s â€˜head of stationâ€™ in London.
Milliband told the Commons that the SOCA investigation had been able to establish that the authentic UK documents had only ever left the hands of their owners when they were taken into the temporary possession of Israeli officials either in London or in transit at Ben Gurion Airport in Israel. He declared:
“We have concluded, that there are compelling reasons to believe that Israel was responsible for the misuse of the British passports. Such misuse is intolerable. It represents a profound disregard for the sovereignty of the United Kingdom. The fact that this was done by a country which is a friend, with significant diplomatic, cultural, business and personal ties to the UK, only adds insult to injury. No country or government could stand by in such a situation. I have asked that a member of the Embassy of Israel be withdrawn, and this is taking place.”
It will be interesting to see what the Jewish Chronicle makes of Millibandâ€™s announcement. On 26th February the paper, under the heading â€œMillion Jews aid Mossad says writer on Radio 4â€ tried to pooh-pooh information that Israelâ€™s foreign intelligence service, Mossad, has recruited a million Jews world-wide to assist with its espionage activities.
This denial of Mossadâ€™s million helpers among Diaspora Jewry studiously failed to mention the existence of a sub-unit of Mossad known as the â€œSayanimâ€ [= â€œHelpersâ€].
Sayanim are Jews who live in and hold the citizenship of lands outside Israel who are recruited clandestinely by Mossad to help with its operations, i.e. providing â€˜safe housesâ€™, transportation, access to communications networks and other facilities, official documents, etc., etc.
Full (and undenied) details of the existence of the Mossad Sayanim network were given in the 1994 book The Other Side of Deception by Victor Ostrovsky, a renegade Mossad agent.
It is certain that not all Sayanim are recruited by Mossad talent-scouts in the Diaspora lands of their birth where they hold citizenship; some are recruited while on visits to Israel. Ever since Israel was proclaimed in 1948, it has been an objective of the Zionist movementâ€™s premier international organisation, the World Jewish Congress (WJC), to achieve a bonding between Jews of the Diaspora and Israel.
This policy was articulated with astounding frankness by Zionismâ€™s foremost strategist of the 20th century, Nahum Goldmann. Goldmann co-founded the World Jewish Congress with Rabbi Stephen S. Wise in 1934 and was president of the WJC from 1949 to 1977. In his book, The Jewish Paradox(1978), he argued that this bonding process be implemented among Jews in their late teens when all young people are at their most idealistic and impressionable.
Goldmann advocated that as many young Jews as possible be enabled to go to Israel for what are now known as â€˜gap-yearsâ€™, within or just before university education, for immersion in the Israeli way of life by way of working on kibbutzimor in one of the social services â€” or even as recruits to the Israeli Defence Force.
He even had the effrontery to argue that the governments of Diaspora nations sympathetic to the Jewish cause would facilitate this process and, indeed, might be persuaded to donate funds from their respective national exchequers to help pay for it!
Whether thisÂ is, or has been, done by the British government I do not know. But several Zionist charities which organise and (nominally) pay for such gap years in Israel for young Jews holding British nationality all publish registered charity numbers which means their funds are exempt from taxation, so the operation certainly has an indirect subsidy courtesy of the British taxpayer.
During their stay in Israel the most avid young Zionists who also possess the required intellects and personality traits are recruited and, no doubt, given training. The process is very little different in principle from that perpetrated by the Soviet NKVD spymaster who recruited and trained the ring of Soviet spies at Cambridge University just before World War II: Guy Burgess, Donald Duart MacLean, Kim Philby, Anthony Blunt & Co. were able to penetrate the highest reaches of Britainâ€™s Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) during the war when Britain was allied to the USSR. They frustrated and subverted British anti-Soviet intelligence operations during the Cold War.
The only difference between the Soviet-British and the Zionist-Jewish operation is that the Zionists are doing it on a continuous, global, mass-production basis and are carrying out the work of spotting, recruiting and training each new wave of young talent within the borders of Israel where such activity is outside the scope of the laws of Diaspora countries.
Activities of the Sayanim
Sayanim in Britain and Italy assisted with the 1986 abduction and smuggling to Israel (drugged, in a packing case) of Mordechai Vanunu, the Christian-convert Israeli scientist who blew the whistle on Israelâ€™s secret nuclear bomb-making facility at Dimona.
Sayanim also helped Mossad agents in New Zealand four years ago purloin official New Zealand passports belonging to a number of its elderly, infirm and otherwise vulnerable citizens. These passports were intended for Mossad use in espionage and murder operations elsewhere in the world.
Mossad hoped that the people whose identities they were stealing would be less likely to notice if anything was amiss and report it to the authorities. That is the kind of cynical wickedness which Israel-admirers tend to dismiss with an indulgent smile as mere â€œchutzpahâ€. (These are the same people who speak of the â€œhigh ethical standardsâ€ of the Israeli Defence Force.)
The plucky New Zealand government of the time did not take that view. Two Mossad agents were jailed, and Israel was required to express a public apology and provide assurances that it would never undertake to do such a thing again. The apology and assurances were given.
Such Israeli assurances are not worth a cup of cold spit. In the debate which followed Millibandâ€™s ministerial statement, William Haigh, Conservative shadow foreign secretary, reminded the House of Commons that Israel had been caught in a similar UK passport forgery operation in 1987. He said the then Israeli foreign minister â€” now President of Israel â€” Shimon Peres, gave a solemn verbal and written assurance to the British government that â€œsuch a thing will never happen againâ€.
Haighâ€™s remark is noteworthy for its absence from most media reports of the debate the following day.
As we now know, forged British, as well as Australian, French, German and Dutch passports, were used in the Dubai assassination of Mahmoud Mabhouh.
It is, of course, outrageous â€” in diplomatic language â€œan unfriendly actâ€ â€” for the secret service of a foreign power to recruit the nationals of another country to assist with any kind of espionage activity in let alone against the interests of that other country.
Mossad perpetrates just such activity in every Diaspora land where there is a Jewish community simply because the governments of most nations (especially Britain, the USA, Canada, Germany, Italy, Poland) are normally reluctant to take effective action to stamp out such subversion for fear of:
Why Mossad’s Bosses Know They Are Able To Get Away With Murder
- Shrill accusations of â€œanti-semitismâ€; or
- Fear that local Friends of Israel organisations will cease making cash donations to their Establishment political parties; or
- Pressure from the USA, which is always willing to assist Israel because its entire political system and mass media are dominated by Zionist-Jews or non-Jew careerists whom they have suborned.
The blind-eye which successive British governments give to Mossad-Sayanim subversion in the UK was institutionalised in the mid 1990s when the Home Office, which supervises Britainâ€™s police service and the internal security service (MI5), gave permission for the London Metropolitan Police and the Greater Manchester Police to provide ongoing training for and intelligence-sharing with the Community Security Trust (CST).
The CST is the security and intelligence arm of the Board of Deputies of British Jews (JBD), whose prospectus declares that it exists to â€œProtect the interests, religious rights and security of Jews world-wide and to advance Israelâ€™s security, welfare and standingâ€. Quite clearly concerns about loyalty issues are not uppermost in the minds of the organised Jewish community.
In an article in The Observer of Sunday 2nd February 1997, the then JBD â€œDefence Directorâ€ Michael Whine (now living and working in Israel) revealed that the CST is
“a 2,000 strong defence forceâ€¦. with a sophisticated intelligence system which provides security guards and trains bodyguards â€¦. Personnel undertake vigorous physical training.”
CST formations are often seen escorting Zionist political demonstrations and other Jewish communal public manifestations wearing uniform day-glow jackets similar to those sported by the police, but with â€œCSTâ€ stamped on them in large letters. CST personnel are paraded in public places even though all such activities are given a full Police escort, which is sufficient protection for all manner of other folks and organisations in our land.
In the light of such public manifestations of the CST and Michael Whineâ€™s admissions, it is important to note that under Section 1 of the Public Order Act of 1936 (enacted to cramp the style of the Blackshirts of Sir Oswald Mosleyâ€™sÂ British Union of Fascists) it is illegal to â€œorganise and/or equip and/or train a paramilitary force for the purpose of achieving political objectives by means of physical forceâ€â€¦.. or â€œâ€¦.to behave in such a manner as to give reasonable apprehensionâ€¦.â€ of being so engaged. Nevertheless, the CST is somehow exempt from Section 1 of the Public Order Act.
The late Colin Jordan and three of his associates in the now long-defunct National Socialist Movement were jailed in 1963 after an Old Bailey trial for periods ranging from three to nine months even though they had been found not guilty of the substantive offence but guilty of â€œgiving reasonable apprehensionâ€ that the unarmed 12-man formation of stewards (who wore uniform grey shirts) called The Spearhead was in breach of the Act.
When I was organising National Front demonstrations in the 1970s I was continually warned about the terms of that Act when I visited Scotland Yardâ€™s A8 Public Order department to negotiate routes for marches and other details. I was told that it would be considered an offence against the Act if the members of the NF Drum Corps even so much as wore similar white shirts! (â€œThat would be considered a uniform. They would be arrested.â€)
The Home Office plan to put the police into bed with a private Zionist paramilitary/security/spook organisation was engineered by a top civil servant, Neville Nagler, who headed the Home Office department responsible for race relations issues and who boasted to my old friend, the late Dowager Lady Birdwood, of having drafted every speech on race relations topics made by every Home Secretary, Labour and Conservative, for more than a decade.
Guess what? When he retired from the Home Office, Nagler was immediately appointed Executive Director of the JBD.
Now chief constables and other very senior police officers attend annual CST banquets at super-luxurious Mayfair hotels where they rub shoulders with leading Zionist fanatics, many of whom are multi-millionaires and some of whom are convicted fraudsters and ex-jail-birds. (For more details about this, see my TOOÂ essay â€œIs there a revolt brewing against the Israel Lobby in Britain.â€)
In the light of all these facts, it seems to me reasonable to assert that many of the Zionist-Jews who are motivated to join the CST will be prime targets for recruitment into the ranks of Mossad Sayanim â€” that is, if they have not already been recruited during gap years spent in Israel bonding with the Zionist state.
The Jewish Chronicleâ€™s studious avoidance of any mention of Mossadâ€™s world-wide Sayanim network in its attempt to discount the notion of a million Jews around the world organised to assist Mossad operations can only evoke rueful smiles from those non-Jews who know what the score is â€” and belly-laughs from the Jews.
*Martin Webster (email him) has been a racial-nationalist activist in Britain since he was an 18 year old in 1961. From 1969 until 1983 he was National Activities Organiser of the National Front and a member of its National Directorate. In 1973 he was the first nationalist in Britain (pre- or post-WW2) to â€œsave a depositâ€ (then set at 12.5%, currently set at 5%) in a parliamentary election when he won 16.02% of the poll at West Bromwich in 1973. Since 1983 he has not associated with any political organisation. He issues occasional e-bulletins to a world-wide circle of friends (and some enemies).
National Front demonstrations were attended by many hundreds, sometimes thousands of supporters, when the party was â€˜on the boilâ€™ in the late 1970s. On this occasion in 1977, an anti-immigration march through the Borough of Hyde in Greater Manchester proposed by me when I was NF National Activities Organiser was banned under the Public Order Act on the grounds that it was likely to be a focus of â€œserious disturbancesâ€. When the ban was promulgated, I announced that there would be two NF marches in Manchester on the appointed Saturday. The NF membership would march in one of the other boroughs of the city where no ban applied. Its assembly place and route would not be announced in advance so that the massed Red â€˜Rentamobâ€™ would not know where to turn up to be â€œprovokedâ€ into staging a riot. The second â€˜marchâ€™ would be conducted by me along the main street in Hyde where the ban applied. I carried a Union Jack flag and a placard reading â€œDefend British Free Speech from Red Terrorismâ€. The authorities would have to make up their minds if such a one-man demonstration contravened the ban. This strategy had the effect of fragmenting the Red mob, some of whom went to Hyde believing that all the NF would go there to defy the ban; others scoured around Greater Manchester, a huge area, seeking the NF column. Both NF events were conducted without any disorders, but with considerable expressions of support from ordinary Mancunians out for their Saturday shopping. Such a large number of police officers escorted me that the effect was a march of constables. It made the ban ludicrous. Apart from massive media publicity for days before and after the event, its planning and conduct was also made the subject of a BBC TV â€˜Inside Storyâ€™ film.