A Jewess’s rant in The Spectator against the British body politic

by Martin Webster

Hysterical, self-pitying, self-indulgent, arrogant, spiteful, illogical, hateful.

These are the adjectives which came into my mind when reading Tanya Gold’s tirade — “‘Utterly betrayed’: Britain’s Jews are now politically homeless” by Tanya Gold – in The Spectator of Saturday 9th November 2019 — initially against the Corbynite left of the Labour Party, but which developed against much of our country’s body politic.

In the end, I was left with a sense that she was raging against the British people and nation as a whole — even the gentile world at large. This is nothing new in the voluminous canon of Jewish contemplation about the ‘goyim’, the inhabitants of the non-Jewish world.

Tanya Gold

If somebody had published such a screed against Jewry they might find themselves charged with some sort of “hate crime”, under a law devised by Jewish lawyers and pushed on to the Statute Book at the behest of Jewish organisations such as the Board of Deputies of British Jews and Jewish parliamentarians (of all parties) and their gentile philo-semitic colleagues (of all parties), all of whom are at once:

(a) perpetually hungry for Jewish financial and media patronage bestowed by the likes of the Conservative/Labour ‘Friends of Israel’ organisations,
terrified of being marked down as “anti-semitic” if they refused any Jewish demand.

I found that the case which Tanya Gold’s article seeks to assert self-destructed as I read it, so I will not seek to deconstruct it in detail here. I will simply point to one short passage which exposes the school playground level bigotry — and hence the hypocrisy — of this woman who seeks to denounce bigotry:

“…I have not considered voting Conservative before. But I won’t. There is
a respectable strain of Conservatism, but this is not it, not for me – one
glance at Jacob Rees-Mogg’s face is enough…”

Jewry seeks to control all political parties

Judah has become rampant in Britain not only on account of what the founder of modern political Zionism, Theodor Herzl, described as “…the terrible power of our purse…”, and not only because of the ever-increasing Jewish control of the media, but because Jewry has been able to dominate all the parliamentary political parties – and a lot of the minor parties as well.

In that latter regard, let us not forget Jewry’s sustained effort, circa 1998 to 2007, to get British National Party leader Nick Griffin ‘on board’ only to find that he and his party were so ‘flaky’ that they had to turn their effort to dominate the “far Right” to cultivating the man who calls himself ‘Tommy Robinson’ and promoting his ‘English’ [sic] Defence League. I chronicled all this in my Electronic Loose Cannon e-mail bulletins issued during the first decade of this century while the BNP was still significantly extant.

Jewry’s strategy has been simple for the past 100 years or more: It seeks to exert a controlling influence over all political parties, factions and tendencies so as to protect Jewry both here in Britain and abroad — especially (post WW2) Israel, which is the totem pole focus of its essential tribal and hence political loyalty.

It is because Jewry sees its once stranglehold grip on the Labour Party slipping, at least for the moment, and because it fears that if Labour’s bid for independence is allowed to succeed then the revolt might spread to other major parliamentary parties, that it is making war on the Corbyn-led Labour Party with increasing ferocity.

The Conservative Party purports to be fighting the 12th December General Election to “Get Brexit Done”. In my view that slogan is a confidence trick because the ‘Brexit’ which Boris Johnson is offering is not an implementation of the 2016 Referendum result which mandated a clean break from the EU and all its institutions.

Parties which seek to escape
Jewish control to be destroyed

Jewry is engaged in this election, increasingly by giving support to the
Conservatives, not to achieve any sort of Brexit (to which it is opposed as a revolt against the internationalist and cosmopolitan milieu in which it thrives but all others involved degenerate) but to shatter the Corbynite hold on the Labour Party and, thereby, to demonstrate to the entire body politic that parties and politicians who seek to escape Jewish control will be destroyed.

It was this motivation that prompted the Board of Deputies of British Jews, via the Labour Friends of Israel, to set up in 1977 the Anti Nazi League (“Anal” to nationalists) in alliance with the ‘anti-Zionist’ Socialist Workers Party, then led by a group of Israeli passport-holders fronted by a man who called himself ‘Tony Cliff’ but whose real name was Ygael Gluckstein. In the run-up to the 1979 General Election Anal subjected the National Front’s lawful activities to mob violence. Their objective was made clear with their chant: “Smash!–Smash!–Smash the National Front!” It is deliciously ironic that among those active in Anal’s ‘Red Rent-a-Mob’ are people who are now being witch-hunted as Corbynite “anti-semites” within the Labour

Jewry’s strategy in treating the current Labour Party with the same venom — if not, yet, with the same degree of physical violence — as it deployed against the NF in the 1970s strikes me as very high risk. In making such an effort Jewry puts itself on view to the general public in a way that it traditionally prefers not to do. The nasty, neurotic, self-worshipping aspect of Jewry’s personality becomes exposed, as it is here for all to see in Tanya Gold’s article.

‘Anti-semitic’ or not, the Labour Party is multi-racialist

This is not a plea for anybody to vote Labour on 12th December! Whether or not there are “anti-semites” within the Labour Party, that party — be it ‘Blairite’ or ‘Corbynite’ — adheres to unrestricted immigration not only from Europe but from the whole of Africa, Asia and South America and actively approves of inter-racial mating. It seeks to allow the families of illegal immigrants to “unite” — here, not in their own ancestral homelands. Corbyn himself in his younger days flaunted his relationship with the negress Diane Abbott, now the Labour Shadow Home Secretary.

When Coloured Immigration into the UK commenced in the late 1940s the
Communist Party was comprised for the most part of Scots and Jews. To begin with the Jock element was in the ascendancy and proclaimed (correctly in my view) that Coloured Immigration was a “bosses’ plot to undermine the wages of British workers”. But the Jews, fearful of where such sentiments might lead if British society became less, not more, cosmopolitan, fought back and eventually turned the CP in favour of immigration and multi-racialism. (“Workers of all Lands Unite!”) This policy development soon influenced the Labour Party. Those seeking to know how the CP influenced Labour Party policy in the 1940s have only to read Douglas Hyde’s 1951 memoir: I Believed: The Autobiography of a Former British Communist.

This ‘Communist’ multi-racialist policy is in fact an essentially Jewish policy; a strategy devised to leave non-Jewish nations/societies weaker and, relatively, Jewry stronger. If Jewry sustains its internal discipline, via Judaism and societal pressure, which interdicts marriage with non-Jews (“Vot? You vant to continue ze vork of Hitler?”) whilst promoting all manner of non-Jewish races to inter-breed with each other, then the culturally/ethnically distinct Jewish population will develop its patriotism and objectives whilst all manner of other folks are dissolved into racial/cultural chaos.

Not that the Jews are a particularly ethnically homogeneous nation, but as I have remarked before: In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is King.

Labour Struggles With “Antisemitism”

Labour and antisemitism
From the Hull Daily Mail of 7th August 2018

In response to this news item concerning Labour Party “antisemitism”, Will Wright, who lives in Hull, wrote to the Hull Daily Mail, which published his letter on 20th August 2018. Here is his letter:

Labour and "antisemitism"

Will’s reference to Momentum and its Jewish organiser, Jon Lansman, is there because it illustrates very well the power exercised over politicians and political parties by influential Jews and Jewish organisations.

Lansman was instrumental in Jeremy Corbyn’s election as party leader in 2015, and in the selection of a raft of far-left candidates to represent Labour in the 2016 General Election. In his role as Chairman of Momentum, he addressed the Limmud Festival of Jewish Learning and Culture in Birmingham in December 2017 to say that Labour must do more to stamp out “antisemitism” within its ranks.

Jon Lansman

He identified no less than three categories of “antisemitism” in Labour. Two of them, he freely acknowledges, are not much of a problem. The third arises from the Israel-Palestine conflict, and he bemoans the “dreadful anti-Semitism” that it engenders.

His answer is not to examine the causes of this “antisemitism”, such as Israel’s genocide programme for the Palestinians, and to see if there are any lessons to learn from it, but to “stamp it out, oppose it, make clear it is unacceptable”.

He defended his promotion of Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader by saying that he was “the only person on the Left who could have gone on the ballot paper”. That’s as good an endorsement as you’re likely to get from someone like Lansman. But back to his crusade against “antisemitism”.

Historically, whatever “antisemitism” has come out of the Labour Party has come from the far left rather than from the mainstream, or right, of the party. So why does someone like Lansman promote candidates of the far left? Wouldn’t they be more inclined to feed the “antisemitism” he professes to be so worried about?

It wouldn’t be because Lansman and his allies in Momentum and elsewhere have a secret agenda, would it? To stoke divisions in Labour in order to split the party so they can prepare the ground for an even more obnoxious (if that’s possible) party of the left? One that Jews and Jewish organisations can control even better than they now control Labour?

This is not as unlikely as it might at first appear. Look at what the largely Jewish mainstream media here in Britain are able to get away with. Here is Will Wright’s explanation.

Spot the difference?
  • Hitler claimed that, of all the peoples on earth, the Aryan race is nature’s ‘master race’. He is denounced for ever more as a race-hater. Conversely, the Jews’ holy book states that, of all the peoples on earth, God loves the Jews the most, they are the Chosen people. We must accept this in the interests of religious tolerance.
  • During the break-up of Yugoslavia, the Serbs forcibly moved non-Serbs from the territory they controlled – this was condemned by the media as ‘ethnic cleansing’. Conversely, Israel continues to forcibly move Palestinian Arabs from territory it controls – the media calls this ‘Israel’s right to a national homeland’.
  • In 2003 Iraq was thought to have broken a UN ruling and it was given a strictly limited time to put this right before facing bombing and invasion. Conversely, Israel violates UN rulings repeatedly, over decades, and no punishment is forthcoming.
  • Iran is believed to be developing nuclear power and is told to stop by the USA. North Korea tests missiles that could carry a nuclear warhead and is told to stop by the USA. Conversely Israel is widely acknowledged to have about eighty nuclear missiles. The USA operates a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy towards Israel and continues to give it financial, political and military backing.
  • In the 1970s the National Front advocated “Stop Immigration – Start Repatriation” (so Britain could be exclusively British) and was denounced across the media as a ‘fascist party’. Britain must be multi-racial claims the Jewish press. Conversely, Israel passes a law to facilitate Israel becoming ‘an exclusively Jewish state’. Anyone here in Britain who questions this is called an ‘anti-Semite’ and a ‘Nazi’.
  • Two countries that are geographically outside of Europe like to be thought of as ‘European’ for political reasons – Turkey and Israel. Turkey joins NATO and applies to join the EU. Conversely, Israel shuns joining either.

Zionists and their political lackeys claim that the Jews are an ‘exceptional’ people. They claim that Israel is an ‘exceptional’ country. Well, it certainly seems that they are the exception to the rules that most peoples of the world have to obey. I wonder why?