Martin Webster
This post will explain our view that the proposed Ukraine Peace Treaty will fail. A long-time Nationalist friend from our days in the National Front in the 1970s/80s has responded to my assertion — and the assertion of many another — that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was in response to the U.S/Nato setting up nuclear-armed military bases at or near to Russia’s border. He says there is no such U.S./Nato policy and claims that all of Russia’s neighbours were frightened of Russia and had requested of their own volition the protection of Nato membership.
NATO’s flawed policy
Nato has a fundamental policy: “An attack on one is an attack on all”. That means the power which seeks the downfall of the Putin regime in Russia — International Finance (a.k.a. in mediaspeak “the West”) — was prepared to plunge the entire world into a nuclear war in order to come to the assistance of some East Europe pipsqueak state which had got into a squabble with its neighbour (Russia) over an issue of not the slightest significance to the multi-millions of people around the world who would perish.
Ukraine was first in line among the recent Nato membership applicants. Ukraine is directly on the border with Russia; indeed, from the early 17th century until the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991, it was a part of Russia. Since an illegal coup, orchestrated by the intelligence services of “the West”, replaced a pro-Russia government in 2014, Ukraine has had a government heavily infiltrated by corrupt Jews, which is now led by a Jewish President, Volodymyr Zelensky.
Several of Zelensky’s long-time close business and governmental associates, including Timur Mindich (see his photo above), have recently fled to Israel (where they also had citizenship!) after looting hundreds of millions of dollars from a state energy company. The money was largely donations sent to Ukraine by governments in “the West” — to the warm applause of tax-paying soppy fools who rely for their ‘knowledge’ about what’s going on in the world on the mainstream media, and we all know who’s in charge of that!
‘Oligarchs’ and asset-looters vs Vladimir Putin
The reason why “International Finance” (based, for the moment, in the U.S.) was keen to oust Ukraine’s pro-Russia government with an anti-Russia pro-“West” government was because when the Soviet Union collapsed and Russia fell into chaos, so-called ‘Oligarchs’ — mainly Jews — were allowed to form monopolistic corporations which asserted ownership of most of Russia’s stupendous assets, in particular its vast array of mineral resources and huge fuel reserves.
While these greed-driven Oligarchs were on-the-grab, the ordinary folk of Russia stared starvation and hypothermia in the face. But, somehow, the Russian people rallied themselves and put into power Vladimir Putin. He initiated the task of restoring to Russia ownership of the country’s fabulous assets. Additionally, Putin restored Russia’s standing as a first-rate, nuclear-armed world power, entitled to a place at the international “top table”.
That turn of events dismayed the Oligarchs and their associates in International Finance who control the entity known as “the West” and its sub-units such as Nato. They had hoped to wax fat on their exploitation of Russia’s stupendous assets, only to see Putin snatch those assets back. In their rage at being baulked of their prey they instigated a policy of inducing states on or close to Russia’s border to join Nato and accept Nato/U.S. bases — and, ahem!, funding. That policy could only be interpreted by Russia as an act of intimidation.
My old friend denies this policy of encircling Russia with Nato/U.S. bases ever existed. So I invite him to look at the following files:
CIA builds 12 secret spy bases in Ukraine along Russian border
This article from Patrick J. Buchanan dated February 2022 on the Monroe Doctrine
Trump should close NATO membership rolls
I have a dozen or so other files on this topic which I will send to anybody who requests them.
If further proof is needed that the U.S. engages is intimidatory military encirclements, I invite him to study the following three images:
(This encirclement, of course, was done at the behest of Israel.)
As usual, the Media are telling us lies
Truth-starved by the mass media, most people have been induced to parrot the notion that Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine was a “monstrous act against a democratic sovereign state which trampled on international law”. But no self-respecting nation would willingly allow its bitterest enemies to encircle it — up to its very borders — with nuclear military bases.
America certainly does not allow itself to be threatened in such a manner by its foes. America has a policy called “The Munroe Doctrine”. This was introduced by U.S. President James Munroe in 1823. It has been treated by successive U.S. presidents as if it were an annex to the U.S. Constitution. It warns European powers not to interfere in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere. (That pleasure is reserved for the USA, as President Tump has just demonstrated in the case of Venezuela.)
“Don’t do as we do…”
The best example of the implementation of “The Munroe Doctrine” was given by U.S. President John F. Kennedy in October 1962. On the 16th of October in that year Kennedy was briefed by U.S. security services that the Soviet Union was setting up a nuclear base in Cuba, an island only a short distance from the USA, and run by the revolutionary communist Fidel Castro. A fleet of Soviet cargo ships was making its way to Cuba, each ship stuffed to the gunnels with rockets capable of hitting deep into America — only 90 miles away from Cuba — in a matter of minutes.
Kennedy made it clear to Soviet Union Premier Nikita Khrushchev that if the convoy proceeded to its destination he would press the red button and launch a nuclear war on the Soviet Union, regardless of the consequences for the USA, its allies, and totally uninvolved nations and peoples around the globe. Khrushchev turned the Soviet fleet around. After breathing a sigh of relief, a large part of the world accorded Kennedy a thundrous round of applause.
If the USA had the right in 1962 to promise to resort to nuclear war if the Soviet Union attempted to set up nuclear rocket bases less than a hundred miles from the U.S. border — and ‘world opinion’ concedes that it did — how was Russia behaving unreasonably and outside contemporary international norms when it invaded Ukraine in order to stop that country providing the USA/Nato with nuclear bases on its border?
Only unreasonable Russiaphobes — which my old friend seems to be! — will deny that Russia was simply following President Kennedy’s example in the case of the Cuban missile crisis — and for the same reasons: “Don’t park you nuclear missile sites near our borders!”
There are now negotiations for a settlement of the Ukraine/Russia crisis with a Peace Treaty. These negotiations are said to be “90%” near to completion. But President Macron of France and his poodle, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, have announced that should a Peace Treaty be concluded, they would put French and British “boots on the ground” in Ukraine to support that country in upholding the terms of the agreement and defending it against any possible further Russian invasion. No doubt some member nations of Nato would join this French and British initiative.
This French/British/(Nato?) proposal is surely designed to sabotage the Peace Treaty.
If the proposed French/British/Nato “boots on the ground” in Ukraine plan includes nuclear rockets, then I anticipate Russia will decline to sign the “Peace Treaty”. To sign it would be to give assent to Nato nuclear bases in Ukraine — the very reason why Russia invaded Ukraine in the first place!
“The West” will only call off its dogs from menancing Russia, if Putin “gives back” to the Oligarchs the treasures they attempted to steal on the collapse of the Soviet Union and allows Russia to be subsumed into the world order desired by the princes of International Finance.
