by Martin Webster
Hysterical, self-pitying, self-indulgent, arrogant, spiteful, illogical, hateful.
These are the adjectives which came into my mind when reading Tanya Goldâ€™s tirade â€” “‘Utterly betrayedâ€™: Britainâ€™s Jews are now politically homeless” by Tanya Gold – in The Spectator of Saturday 9th November 2019 â€” initially against the Corbynite left of the Labour Party, but which developed against much of our countryâ€™s body politic.
In the end, I was left with a sense that she was raging against the British people and nation as a whole â€” even the gentile world at large. This is nothing new in the voluminous canon of Jewish contemplation about the â€˜goyimâ€™, the inhabitants of the non-Jewish world.
If somebody had published such a screed against Jewry they might find themselves charged with some sort of â€œhate crimeâ€, under a law devised by Jewish lawyers and pushed on to the Statute Book at the behest of Jewish organisations such as the Board of Deputies of British Jews and Jewish parliamentarians (of all parties) and their gentile philo-semitic colleagues (of all parties), all of whom are at once:
(a) perpetually hungry for Jewish financial and media patronage bestowed by the likes of the Conservative/Labour â€˜Friends of Israelâ€™ organisations,
(b) terrified of being marked down as â€œanti-semiticâ€ if they refused any Jewish demand.
I found that the case which Tanya Goldâ€™s article seeks to assert self-destructed as I read it, so I will not seek to deconstruct it in detail here. I will simply point to one short passage which exposes the school playground level bigotry â€” and hence the hypocrisy â€” of this woman who seeks to denounce bigotry:
â€œâ€¦I have not considered voting Conservative before. But I wonâ€™t. There is
a respectable strain of Conservatism, but this is not it, not for me â€“ one
glance at Jacob Rees-Moggâ€™s face is enoughâ€¦â€
Jewry seeks to control all political parties
Judah has become rampant in Britain not only on account of what the founder of modern political Zionism, Theodor Herzl, described as â€œâ€¦the terrible power of our purseâ€¦â€, and not only because of the ever-increasing Jewish control of the media, but because Jewry has been able to dominate all the parliamentary political parties â€“ and a lot of the minor parties as well.
In that latter regard, let us not forget Jewryâ€™s sustained effort, circa 1998 to 2007, to get British National Party leader Nick Griffin â€˜on boardâ€™ only to find that he and his party were so â€˜flakyâ€™ that they had to turn their effort to dominate the â€œfar Rightâ€ to cultivating the man who calls himself â€˜Tommy Robinsonâ€™ and promoting his â€˜Englishâ€™ [sic] Defence League. I chronicled all this in my Electronic Loose Cannon e-mail bulletins issued during the first decade of this century while the BNP was still significantly extant.
Jewryâ€™s strategy has been simple for the past 100 years or more: It seeks to exert a controlling influence over all political parties, factions and tendencies so as to protect Jewry both here in Britain and abroad â€” especially (post WW2) Israel, which is the totem pole focus of its essential tribal and hence political loyalty.
It is because Jewry sees its once stranglehold grip on the Labour Party slipping, at least for the moment, and because it fears that if Labourâ€™s bid for independence is allowed to succeed then the revolt might spread to other major parliamentary parties, that it is making war on the Corbyn-led Labour Party with increasing ferocity.
The Conservative Party purports to be fighting the 12th December General Election to â€œGet Brexit Doneâ€. In my view that slogan is a confidence trick because the â€˜Brexitâ€™ which Boris Johnson is offering is not an implementation of the 2016 Referendum result which mandated a clean break from the EU and all its institutions.
Parties which seek to escape
Jewish control to be destroyed
Jewry is engaged in this election, increasingly by giving support to the
Conservatives, not to achieve any sort of Brexit (to which it is opposed as a revolt against the internationalist and cosmopolitan milieu in which it thrives but all others involved degenerate) but to shatter the Corbynite hold on the Labour Party and, thereby, to demonstrate to the entire body politic that parties and politicians who seek to escape Jewish control will be destroyed.
It was this motivation that prompted the Board of Deputies of British Jews, via the Labour Friends of Israel, to set up in 1977 the Anti Nazi League (â€œAnalâ€ to nationalists) in alliance with the â€˜anti-Zionistâ€™ Socialist Workers Party, then led by a group of Israeli passport-holders fronted by a man who called himself â€˜Tony Cliffâ€™ but whose real name was Ygael Gluckstein. In the run-up to the 1979 General Election Anal subjected the National Frontâ€™s lawful activities to mob violence. Their objective was made clear with their chant: â€œSmash!â€“Smash!â€“Smash the National Front!â€ It is deliciously ironic that among those active in Analâ€™s â€˜Red Rent-a-Mobâ€™ are people who are now being witch-hunted as Corbynite â€œanti-semitesâ€ within the Labour
Jewryâ€™s strategy in treating the current Labour Party with the same venom â€” if not, yet, with the same degree of physical violence â€” as it deployed against the NF in the 1970s strikes me as very high risk. In making such an effort Jewry puts itself on view to the general public in a way that it traditionally prefers not to do. The nasty, neurotic, self-worshipping aspect of Jewryâ€™s personality becomes exposed, as it is here for all to see in Tanya Goldâ€™s article.
â€˜Anti-semiticâ€™ or not, the Labour Party is multi-racialist
This is not a plea for anybody to vote Labour on 12th December! Whether or not there are â€œanti-semitesâ€ within the Labour Party, that party â€” be it â€˜Blairiteâ€™ or â€˜Corbyniteâ€™ â€” adheres to unrestricted immigration not only from Europe but from the whole of Africa, Asia and South America and actively approves of inter-racial mating. It seeks to allow the families of illegal immigrants to â€œuniteâ€ â€” here, not in their own ancestral homelands. Corbyn himself in his younger days flaunted his relationship with the negress Diane Abbott, now the Labour Shadow Home Secretary.
When Coloured Immigration into the UK commenced in the late 1940s the
Communist Party was comprised for the most part of Scots and Jews. To begin with the Jock element was in the ascendancy and proclaimed (correctly in my view) that Coloured Immigration was a â€œbossesâ€™ plot to undermine the wages of British workersâ€. But the Jews, fearful of where such sentiments might lead if British society became less, not more, cosmopolitan, fought back and eventually turned the CP in favour of immigration and multi-racialism. (â€œWorkers of all Lands Unite!â€) This policy development soon influenced the Labour Party. Those seeking to know how the CP influenced Labour Party policy in the 1940s have only to read Douglas Hydeâ€™s 1951 memoir: I Believed: The Autobiography of a Former British Communist.
This â€˜Communistâ€™ multi-racialist policy is in fact an essentially Jewish policy; a strategy devised to leave non-Jewish nations/societies weaker and, relatively, Jewry stronger. If Jewry sustains its internal discipline, via Judaism and societal pressure, which interdicts marriage with non-Jews (â€œVot? You vant to continue ze vork of Hitler?â€) whilst promoting all manner of non-Jewish races to inter-breed with each other, then the culturally/ethnically distinct Jewish population will develop its patriotism and objectives whilst all manner of other folks are dissolved into racial/cultural chaos.
Not that the Jews are a particularly ethnically homogeneous nation, but as I have remarked before: In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is King.