Will Wright gives his thoughts on the current state of British Nationalism. This is, of necessity, a brief review, but perhaps it will stimulate thought and discussion via the Comments section below.
It is very clear that none of the three main parties will pursue policies to advance our survival as a nation, let alone our success. The British people need a political party dedicated to promoting their interests. Such a party needs to be racial-nationalist in character, democratic and with a proper legal constitution. At the moment I cannot see anything that fits the bill. But let us take a look at some of the groups and dead ends out there.
United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP)Â â€“ has aimed for a level of professionalism on a par with the Establishment parties. It appears to have a constitution and a rule book and a ruling executive. It appears that Nigel Farage would have liked to have abolished the executive and have an even more personal leadership based on his own personality and power. UKIP did well to win most of the British seats in the EU Parliament. It also won about four million votes, which pressured Prime Minister, David Cameron into holding an In/Out referendum on EU membership.
But UKIP is far too worried about respectability and not being seen as a â€˜far-rightâ€™ or racialist party. I believe that this timidity has limited its potential and more or less consigned it to being just another Establishment party. It has gone into decline after the EU referendum. It may have been used as a vehicle to draw support away from the BNP.
British National Party (BNP)Â â€“ born of John Tyndallâ€™s desire to have absolute control over any party that he led, it doesnâ€™t have a proper democratic and legal constitution. It was stagnant for many years before Nick Griffin mounted a coup. It therefore did not even meet Tyndallâ€™s needs. It started to grow and win local elections under Griffin. The political climate favoured its growth and the BNP worked hard to recruit people.
But Griffin squandered the opportunity to educate patriotic recruits and turn them into lifelong, ideological racial nationalists. Too many party people did not really know what they were fighting for, other than a vague notion that they were against political correctness. Griffin seemed to be too concerned about being seen to be respectable. He wanted a break with the past and thatâ€™s what the BNP got. For me, he broke the ideological link to previous nationalists going back to just after the Second World War. Many BNP members thought that their only enemy was Islamism.
Under Tyndall, the Partyâ€™s fault was a dictatorial leadership. Under Griffin this fault remained and he added a dilution of nationalist ideology to the problems.
English Defence League (EDL)Â â€“ has many faults. If nationalists are going to win in Britain, then it needs to be done by a political party winning seats consistently and then winning power. But the EDL isnâ€™t nationalist, or racialist, or even a political party. It was founded in Luton as a kind of crusade against Islamism. It sees its identity as â€˜Englishâ€™ rather than â€˜Britishâ€™ at a time when the continuance of the United Kingdom is under threat. On the surface, the EDL isnâ€™t concerned about respectability. It attracts politically illiterate football supporters. They know something is wrong with the country and they want some kind of action. In the hands of a racial nationalist party they could be educated and turned into dedicated activists. Instead they hold disorderly street demonstrations and shout football terrace type chants. Oddly, the unrespectable leaders seem at pains to state that they are pro- Israel.
National ActionÂ â€“ has been declared to be a terrorist group, by Home Secretary, Amber Rudd. This was because they applauded the assassination of the Searchlight/Hope Not Hate-supporting Labour MP, Jo Cox by a mentally unwell man. Masked men giving stiff right arm salutes is not the right path for nationalists. The Establishment is looking for any excuse to ban nationalist groups. Islamic terrorist supporters are crying out for â€˜even-handednessâ€™ â€“ they want nationalist groups banned. It is idiocy to give the Government that excuse. In any case, terrorism cannot succeed. Only a mass movement and a political party can effect the necessary change to our country. NA is a dangerous dead end and authentic nationalists should avoid it like the plague.
Britain FirstÂ â€“ seems to have punched above its weight. This small group has a pair of very brave, very active leaders, Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen. Their skilled use of the internet to promote their activities has seen them get international attention. Provided they can recruit and educate nationalists, then they might have the beginning of a good nationalist party. They need to turn their publicity into election success. It may be that they are, like the BNP and the EDL, too focused on Islamism.
National FrontÂ â€“ this is a well-meant attempt to resurrect the original party of the same name. This is a tiny party and some of its members are not old enough to remember the golden years of the nineteen seventies. At the time of writing, it is not making its presence felt on a big enough scale nationally. Has some good people, but not enough of them.
British MovementÂ â€“ this is supposed to be a revival of the original party of that name. In my opinion it is a complete waste of time and energy â€“ a real dead end. It doesnâ€™t fight elections or hold demonstrations. It is an inward-looking group of Hitler enthusiasts. Some of its people donâ€™t even know much about Hitler. If you are an authentic British racial nationalist, then donâ€™t waste your time with this group.
London ForumÂ â€“ is useful for getting nationalists together to hear speeches on various themes. The speeches can then be re-produced on You Tube for dissemination to a wider audience. Its success may be due to its being not party-aligned. If one party emerged as highly dominant on the nationalist scene, then that non-alignment ought to change. Everyone serious about success should then join that party â€“ like what happened in 1967 with the National Front.
Serious nationalists should consider how they are going to succeed. Here are some suggested guidelines.
1.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Know your ideology. Know national and international history. Read books by nationalists and, sometimes, our ideological enemies. Know what constitutes nationalist thinking â€“ and what does not. But donâ€™t be too keen to exclude people. Know what you are fighting for.
2.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Loyalty â€“ be loyal to the Idea, the Cause. But be loyal to the movement, and importantly, be loyal to each other.
3.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Be brave. Physically and also psychologically. Nationalists will be assailed from all sides.
4.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Be self-disciplined.
5.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Donâ€™t be overly bothered about respectability. But donâ€™t go in the opposite direction and try to be politically extreme or sensationalist for its own sake.
6.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Recognise that our ability to persuade our fellow countrymen is the key to our success. Develop your skills as a persuader and a political propagandist. Read up on influence and persuasion techniques. Know your enemiesâ€™ arguments and hone your debating skills.
7.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Understand that winning a general election is the only way that a nationalist party can succeed in the UK. Shun any talk of infiltrating the Establishment parties or of armed revolts or terrorist activity.
8.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Unity. One big nationalist party may succeed â€“ a myriad of tiny nationalist groups never will. Many of the groups mentioned have members that might make good members of a new reformed nationalist movement.
9.Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Leadership. While we should reject dictatorship and personality cults, leadership is important to success. It comes in different forms and operates on different levels. There are organisers, speakers, writers, website-designers, administrators, fund-raisers and distributers of books and magazines.