The Southport Murders – Lessons to learn

Author’s note: What you will read here is NOT a call to hate anyone. This subject easily arouses strong feelings on either side of the argument, but hatred and violence are not the answer. We must dispassionately argue our case before our co-racialists here and abroad until we can be satisfied that our message has successfully been received and understood. Our anger must continue to be directed exclusively towards those organisations and individuals who are working tirelessly to destroy this great country and the White people whose ancestors have created it.

Philip Gegan

Now that the perpetuator of the Southport murders has pleaded guilty and been sentenced on all charges, comment on the case is no longer restricted by the rules of sub judice. Over half a year has passed since the son of Rwandan migrants, one Axel Rudakubana, murdered three small girls aged six, seven, and nine, at a Taylor Swift themed dance class. So we can now look at this case in a more detached and unemotional way than others have done before us.

axel rudakubana
Axel Rudakubana, who committed the Southport murders

In January 2025 Rudakubana was sentenced to a minimum of 52 years in prison on three counts of murder, 10 of attempted murder, and further counts of producing ricin, possessing terrorist material, and possessing a knife. All his victims were White. The organisers of the event, in whose charge these little girls were, acted with incredible bravery in trying to protect them. Many of them are now scarred for life – both physically and mentally.

Government and media reaction to the Southport Murders

The reaction of the government to these murders (and the spontaneous riots that followed) were as predictable as they were pathetic.

Whilst condemning the murders and murderous assaults (as they surely had to), Kier Starmer, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, and the rest of the Labour leadership focused their wrath, not on the killer or the reasons why he was here in our country in the first place, but on the spontaneous riots and other protests that took place in the immediate aftermath of the killings. And the main targets of their venom, needless to say, were the ordinary White folk who formed the vast bulk of the protestors.

This was a shameless attempt to shift the blame for the unrest from themselves and the rest of the multi-racial establishment onto “far right thugs” – the now-famous phrase that both Starmer and Cooper used to describe the protestors.

There was no effort by them to examine the reasons why the Southport murders took place, or ask whether there might have been some valid reason for the protests. They simply assumed that they were in the right and that anyone who disagreed with their insane policies of open borders and their failure to take even the most basic of steps to protect British citizens in their own country were “racist”.

The bigger picture

We need to put the whole matter of the Southport murders into perspective. And that perspective is that millions of racial aliens and their descendants now live in our country, vote in our elections, and enjoy all the advantages of native Britons. Indeed, they not only do that, but in many instances are treated in a preferential way compared to ordinary folk whose ancestors have lived in these islands for countless generations.

And this is, as they say, on-going. There’s no plan to halt the uncontrolled torrent of racial aliens pouring into our country. So it’s getting worse all the time. And all the while the establishment parties retain power at Westminster, and establishment journalists remain in control of the mass media, there’s absolutely no end in sight.

It’s not as if these migrants confer any benefit on us or our country by being here. All they do is enable big, and often foreign owned, businesses to employ cheap labour that squeeze our working people out of their jobs.

They jostle with us in town centres, compete with us for housing, worsen our traffic jams, crowd our criminal courts, prisons and hospitals, and compete with our children for school and university places (with the required standards being lowered so as to ensure “inclusivity”).

They tend to depress our culture with their own peculiar sub-cultures, of which Islam is just one. And our treacherous politicians use them as an excuse to carry out a frightening erosion of our liberties through the proliferation of the woke culture of “diversity, inclusivity and equity/equality”.

When were WE asked?

This in turn is used by Marxists, communists, and all the riff-raff of the Left to destabilise and eventually destroy our great country.

And all this without a shred of consent from us, the native population of these islands. We have never been asked if we consent to the importation of thousands, turning into millions, of non-White migrants, over the years.

Whenever some brave White person has stood up and publicly called this lunacy into question, what do the multi-racialists of the Left do? Do they call for a public debate so that the whole topic can be aired and they can put their peculiar case up against ours for the people to decide? That’s what democracy is supposed to be all about. Do they make any effort at all to understand the fears of millions of ordinary Britons living in their own country in the twenty first century?

Of course not. On every occasion, from Sir Cyril Osborne in 1957, to Enoch Powell in 1968, to the National Front in the 1970s, the BNP in the 1990s and Patriotic Alternative in more recent years, the reaction has been to scream abuse, organise physical violence, and make threats against public opponents of multi-racialism. On a more sinister level, anyone speaking up in public has often found themselves in trouble at work, and facing unemployment and, if they are a professional person, the termination of their career.

The Government is living in fear

This brings us back to the question of who these “far right thugs” are. Many of them, including those now serving long prison sentences out of all proportion to any damage or injury they may have caused, are middle aged and had never been on a demonstration before in their lives. Others are ordinary housewives and mothers, and working men who know little about politics and just cannot understand why successive governments should act in such a treacherous manner.

These are the people that Starmer and Cooper fear, and have threatened with “the full force of the law”.

Such a reaction is what you would expect from a government that is fearful of having to eventually face the consequences of their anti-White behaviour. Starmer is a weak man trying to act like a strong man. He is a frightened man trying to act like a brave man. He is a man of modest intellect trying to behave like an intelligent man. He is a man of no charisma trying to emulate a popular, charismatic leader. And his reaction, and that of the rest of the Labour leadership, betrays that they are hiding something very important.

What are Starmer and Cooper hiding?

Undoubtedly one of the things that they are hiding is the Prime Minister’s personal and professional involvement, in his previous career as a high ranking barrister specialising in “human rights”, in representing illegal migrants in the High Court on appeals against deportation. Thereby, he personally bears a considerable share of the blame for the appalling race problem that we in this country now all face. Naturally, he seeks to suppress, as far as possible, any mention of this in the media, mainstream or social. In other words, he doesn’t want anyone else to find out.

Whilst some social media postings have claimed he represented Rudakubana’s father in such a case, this has been denied by Downing Street. It is true, however, that in the 2000s Starmer was a senior human rights barrister at Left-wing Doughty Street Chambers specialising in the representation of failed asylum seekers. This was and still is a racket, and he undoubtedly made a great deal of taxpayers’ money taking part in it.

Now, some twenty or so years later, the Southport murders have laid bare the strength of public feeling against something that Kier Starmer has spent much of his adult life working for – the mass migration of non-Whites into our country. And they have also shown us the breathtaking lack of any idea that establishment politicians have about how to deal with this crisis.

Oppression and tyranny

What we see in their reaction is fear and panic. That’s why they immediately attacked the protestors, rather than made any attempt to examine the reasons why some sections of the public have reacted so passionately against these killings. They displayed all the hallmarks of oppression and tyranny.

The reasons that I have just mentioned are, for the most part, quite simple. The whole multi-racial concept has been shown for what it really is – a highly organised and deadly covert attack on White people in their own countries.

I don’t see any non-White countries being overwhelmed by an incursion of millions of White people. The population of non-Whites in their own countries is not shrinking as is the numbers of White people in White countries. On the contrary, it is invariably and rapidly growing in numbers.

And in White (or formerly White, now “multi-racial”) countries such as Britain, the number of Whites is invariably shrinking and the number of non-Whites is invariably growing, year after year.

In twenty first century Britain, illegal migrants (nearly all of them non-White) with few legitimate skills, are not detained on arrival and then sent back, as would be the case in any country run by sane and intelligent people.

Instead, they are given smartphones, with ongoing fees paid, weekly free cash and four-star hotel accommodation at the expense of the taxpayer. You just could not make this stuff up. Meanwhile, what happens to our own people, especially the poor and elderly? They have their winter fuel allowance – vital in the face of exploding energy prices – for the most part abolished.

So when three little White girls are savagely slaughtered with a machete in an act of sheer terrorism, their carers attacked, also with a machete, and the culprit is seen to be most likely of immigrant stock (the mainstream media tried at first to convince us that he was Welsh!), it’s not hard to understand why there should be such a violent backlash by working White people.

Only small, independent outlets give us a voice

Whilst this Labour Government has taken our country sharply towards a tyrannical, oppressive future, we have seen little effective opposition to it in the newspapers or magazines, or on the radio or television. It’s only on small, independent outlets such as GB News and Talk TV, and on social media, still largely uncontrolled by the Left and its allies, that the fury and anger of White people can be articulated. Sadly, many have now fallen victim to the absurd “hate” laws, now being used against, not just patriots and racial nationalists, but ordinary folk who have not been particularly interested in politics until jolted into action by the Southport murders.

Public opinion is turning in our favour

As the behaviour of our politicians and civil servants has become more and more extreme, blatantly giving favourable treatment to foreign migrants and treating ordinary working white people with contempt, so has the groundswell of public opinion turned against the establishment parties.

Suddenly the very idea of sharing our small country with millions of third world unskilled, and often illiterate, people of predominantly low intelligence, with no work ethic, no loyalty to this country, no knowledge of or interest in its history and traditions, and many of them following a religion that is menacing towards those who decline to convert to it, is attracting a large and hostile opposition.

And, we might add, not before time.

The outcome

One of the outcomes of the Southport murders has been the meteoric rise in popularity of the Reform UK party, which presents itself as the natural solution to the frightening problems now facing us. Yet this is a party that is populist in outlook, and refuses to recognise the race factor in our present troubles.

Is this because they want a “quiet life”? Because they don’t want any aggravation from the usual suspects (in contrast to what we in the National Front had to contend with in the 1970s)?

Current opinion poll movements suggest that Reform UK may have a real chance of winning power at the 2029 General Election (assuming that this government lasts that long). Do they plan to ride to power on the back of popular reaction to multi-racialism whilst avoiding the fury of the organised Left by leaving aside the awkward question of race?

It seems they are desperate to avoid accusations of “racism”, so they don’t have to jostle with hostile Trotskyists and all the rest of the red rabble on the streets in order to get their message out, and suffer all the indignities, including hostile media reporting and physical threats and violence, that go with it.

Where to go from here?

If they have this clever plan and it works, what will they do if they achieve their objective of becoming the governing party of Britain?

I believe they would have no alternative but to grasp the nettle and tackle the race problem. Even then, it may be too late. They will have to contend with a background of civil war and strife such as has never before been seen in this country. They will have to pursue their programme in an environment where there will be no room for prevarication. Only strong and bold decisions will prevail. Any weakness in the actions that will have to be taken will result in the death of the White race in Britain and the total collapse of civilisation in this country, and possibly the whole world.

If this forecast is correct, and the likes of Nigel Farage and his supporters can grasp the reins of power, will they have the grit, the ability, in the chaos that will undoubtedly surround them, to fight and win?

Only time will tell.

The Front View with Martin Webster – ‘Lewisham, August 1977’

This bombshell interview lifts the lid off the extreme left wing control of the mainstream media.

Martin Webster carries out a complete demolition of the  leftist establishment lies about what happened at Lewisham, London, on August 13th, 1977.

Share with everyone you know who wants proof about leftist lies and deceptions in the mainstream media, and register your interest in helping our Campaign to Abolish the BBC by clicking here.

A K Chesterton, pan-Europeanism, and non-White immigration

Arthur Kenneth Chesterton was a man shaped by the time and place that he was born. He was an imperialist. He was a British patriot, born on the 1st of May 1899, in Krugersdorp, in British South Africa. He was not a hater of other races – not a “racist” as today’s insistent and wrong-headed mass media would have called him. He did not actively choose to become a racialist, based on intellectual arguments. He was born when the vast majority of White Europeans, of all nationalities, naturally assumed White racial superiority.

Chesterton and Mosley

In Britain in the Thirties, AK Chesterton joined Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists for a short period of a few years, before falling out with Mosley and leaving his movement. During those few years Chesterton was responsible for about seventy percent of all BUF propaganda output. He was a talented writer and editor. He was related to the famous novelist, GK Chesterton, and his brother, the well-known journalist, Cecil Chesterton.

At the out break of the Second World War, AK Chesterton enlisted in the British Army and fought for his country, just as he had already done in the First World War. After the War, Chesterton found even greater ideological political differences with Mosley. Mosley now believed in pan-Europeanism, and used the slogan: “Europe-a nation”. But AK Chesterton founded the League of Empire Loyalists, and was firmly opposed to British government attempts to join the European Economic Community.

When the National Front was founded in 1967, AK Chesterton was its first leader. But before then he wrote The New Unhappy Lords, subtitled: “an exposure of power politics”. My copy of the book is the fourth revised edition of October 1972. Chapter 21 is: Demoralisation at Home, from page 164 to 171, it is too long to quote in full in this letter.

Supreme Treason

On page 167 AK Chesterton writes:

“The supreme treason in the British Isles, however, is the creation of a colour problem in a White nation where no such problem has existed throughout the hundreds of years of its existence. In the 1955 elections the present writer and some of his colleagues went to Bromley to challenge Harold MacMillan about this issue, which even then had assumed alarming proportions. MacMillan said that he, too, was very much concerned about the situation…”

Chesterton continues:

“The next year MacMillan became Prime Minister, with power to move and secure the passage through Parliament of measures to put an end to coloured immigration. He did nothing. While he posed and strutted on the stage of public life further hundreds of thousands of coloured people poured into the British Isles from the West Indies, from West Africa, from India and Pakistan and from many other countries, thus casting derision upon Harold Macmillan’s professed “concern”, the expression of which obviously had no meaning other than to delude the British people. Today the coloured invasion has spread throughout England, being encountered even in the remotest country villages.”

A little later, Chesterton goes on:

“The politicians, to whom votes are all-important, now began to perceive that it was necessary to take some kind of a public stand, in their propaganda if not in their actions, against the coloured invasion, and Peter Thorneycroft, a prominent member of the previous Conservative Government, spoke to a Conservative gathering of the need not only to tighten up controls but to return to the country-of-origin certain types of immigrant. Thorneycroft had suffered a spell in the political wilderness by resigning from the Government on a relatively minor matter which concerned a difference on financial policy. Why, if he felt so strongly about the creation of the colour problem, did he not resign on this major matter, affecting in perpetuity the breed of men produced in the British Isles? The answer could be that the vested interests sponsoring coloured immigration had become so strong that anybody rash enough to offer real opposition might well be committing political suicide.”

The Mongrelisation of Mankind

Chesterton concludes:

“The dominating motive may well have been not economic but political – the conspiratorial plan, everywhere being carried out, of securing the mongrelisation of mankind. More will be said about this later. What has here to be stated, with the greatest possible emphasis, is that the mixing of White and Black or Coloured people results in hordes of unhappy half-castes who feel that they belong nowhere, whose tendency is to embrace the vices of both racial stocks and not to strive after the virtues, and who must eventually, through no fault of their own, bring to an end the tremendous history of achievement which is the heritage of the European nations.”

We should notice that AK Chesterton was writing in a book first published in 1965 and revised in 1972, about a situation that he first mentions in 1955! He writes of the Conservative Party’s intention to lie about both non-White immigration itself, and its own claimed policies to remedy the situation.

When Chesterton mentions “the vested interests sponsoring coloured immigration” and their strength, he is referring to organised Jewish interests. Why do I think that? Because the main thrust of the rest of his book is about the Jewish involvement in a drive towards a world government.

The Conservative Party has repeatedly lied about immigration over many decades now. All of my lifetime. It tells the public that it will deal with this problem, when it is clear that it will not.

Who is responsible?

One local friend of mine blames the generation of ordinary Britons who are now elderly (in their eighties) for not rising up against non-White immigration. He believes that ordinary Britons should have joined, and voted for, the National Front in the 1970s. If I have understood him correctly, in pub conversations, he also blames the National Front leadership of the Seventies for failing to win political power.

In an interview with Edward Dutton online, Martin Webster blamed our country’s leadership class for not providing proper national leadership. He said that it then fell to the lower middle class, and working class, people of the National Front to lead the opposition to the invasion of our country.

I agree that the Establishment betrayed us. Were they ALL either mercenary or ideological traitors? Were they careerists, individualists, and moral cowards? Could none of them see the long-term results of massive non-White immigration?

I believe that one group of people, both in Britain and across the Western World could foresee the long-term results of non-White immigration – the organised Jewish community. I believe, along with Arthur Kenneth Chesterton, that organised Jewish groups planned all of this. Partly out of a sense of revenge against Christendom, and also in order to achieve their aim of a one-world-state, with a world government. I offer no prizes for guessing who would control that!

Copyright (c) 2023 Will Wright. For permission to reproduce this post please contact the author through this web site.
RSS
Follow by Email