Martin Webster
Two of our recent posts in Anglo-Celtic have focused on how the BBC is continuously churning out race-mixing propaganda in its licence-fee-payer-funded programmes. Now I want to focus on the subversive, genocidal poison of TV adverts.
This propaganda purports to be actualité both in present day and historical Britain. Both assertions are mendacious (the present day slightly less so than the historical).
Historical lies from left-wing academics
These historical lies are contrived to cause the less astute among us — especially youngsters — to think that race-mixing and mongrelisation have always been the norm. It’s even advanced as the “secret of ethnically diverse societies’ success”! (These are never specified as they don’t exist.)
These ‘historical’ messages are often buttressed by left-wing academics.
One such, a Cambridge University professor (no, not the late fantasist and plagiarist ‘Professor’ Jason Arday!) took a TV audience to one of the Triumphal columns still standing in Rome. Amidst the dense ranks of marching legions depicted on the column a single head was singled out for comment: that of an African negro legionary.
The professor used this to suggest to viewers that negroes were a significant component of Rome’s legions — and therefore of Rome’s population — at that time, rather than an exotic exception.
Race-mixing a cause of Rome’s collapse
The Roman Empire did of course collapse centuries after that column was erected. This was due to many factors including civil wars and increasing invasions by barbarians. But one of the main reasons was that the lower section of Roman society increasingly mated with dusky slaves, diluting the ethnic identity, quality and cohesion of Roman society.
In the north of Italy today the fair-skinned clearly European population can be heard to utter an old local saying: “L’Africa comincia da Roma!” (“Africa begins at Rome!”)
The same inaccurate and misleading multi-culty/race-mixing propaganda is being deployed quite outrageously by the (mainly Jewish-owned) firms who make TV adverts transmitted by all the non-BBC (mainly Jewish-owned) ‘commercial’ channels.
We are now subject to ‘typical family’ scenes in which all or most of the characters are black or brown — or worse — the ‘husband’ (it’s always the husband!) is black and the ‘wife’ is white. The children, of course, are mulattoes.
Some of the adverts verge on the semi-pornographic and insulting by showing a white women in bed, or on a sofa, with a young black or Asian man.

White males are being culturally ‘killed off’
It is significant that adverts increasingly don’t show a young or middle-aged white man — or even white male children. If an adult white man is shown at all, he’s in the background and is an ageing ‘Grandpa’ figure.
The advert-makers are culturally ‘killing-off’ white males as active father figures and figures of authority. It is a form of cultural genocide: multi-racialism, as influenced by that other anti-male ‘Woke’ cult, ‘Feminism’.
Such scenes are not remotely depictions of average indigenous-British households in the United Kingdom. They are reflections of what the advert-makers want to see — and as soon as possible!
Why are the TV media inflicting such poisonous race-mixing propaganda on us — and especially youth audiences? More to the point: is the government using public money to subsidise or reward the production of such poisonous brainwashing garbage?
The broadcasting of such race-mixing poison seems to have kicked-off immediately following the result of the ‘Brexit’ referendum in June 2016 in which a majority of British voters demanded Britain quit the European Union. Many political analysts rightly also saw the Brexit vote as a gesture against coloured immigration and race-mixing.
The people who own and run the TV media sense that at long last the white-British people are waking up to the way in which successive Conservative and Labour governments have betrayed them in allowing Britain to become a dump for the surplus population of Africa, Asia, the Middle-East and South America.
Anti-immigration sentiments increasing
Nowadays angry demonstrations of local people erupt whenever in any small town it is announced that a local hotel is to be turned into a hostel for young male illegal immigrant ‘asylum-seekers’.
The “Stop-immigration – Start Repatriation!” sentiment is now widespread and popular among the white British.
These anti-immigration sentiments may soon be translated into votes — though whether the recipient of these votes (such as Nigel Farage’s pro-Zionist Reform UK) will prove to be reliable is quite another question. (Anglo-Celtic.com will deal with that matter in a forthcoming article.)
A strong — perhaps governing — representation of ‘Stop Immigration! Start Repatriation!” MPs in the House of Commons would not suit those who constitute the financial ‘Establishment’ of our country.
Hence desperate efforts are being made by the media to ‘condition’ the minds of the British public — especially our youngsters — to accept that race-mixing, half-caste babies and the destruction of the indigenous White-European ethnic population (“The British”) is an “inevitable” process.
Subversive genocidal poison can be stopped and reversed
If we, the British people, rise up and take action in our localities, then this treasonous genocidal process can be stopped and reversed. We will have our way.
In considering these issues we ask readers to bear in mind two facts:
1) The majority of commercial TV companies and the firms creating TV adverts are owned by Jews.
2) The Jewish state of Israel has a law called “The Law of the Return” which permits any Jew from anywhere in the world to claim Israeli citizenship — but only those who can prove their Jewish ancestry to the satisfaction of a court of rabbis.
Why do the Jews, who own and control our mass media and the adverts which they carry, actively encourage the mongrelisation of the indigenous British people through race-mixing, yet assert the right to reserve their (stolen) “homeland” Israel as a place where only Jews may live and have citizenship?
Why are Jews allowed to be “racist” — but also allowed to condemn all other people who wish to preserve their racial heritage, nationhood and ancestral culture as “evil”?
Part of the answer is Jewish ownership and control of the mass media and their financial control of all the political parties in Parliament.
For the moment, nobody in Britan is standing up for the indigenous British people and standing up to Jewry which seemingly wants everybody on this planet to mongrelise — except themelves.
Anglo-Celtic, why not but what about all the other white people?
And what about the Anglo-Saxons and Normans, and all the other people?
We use the term Anglo-Celtic to include all white people.
Jews control politicians, media and entire countries due to their ponzi schemes and the money they accumulated through centuries with usury.
Remove or nationalize central banks (and the globalist organizations behind it such as the BIS, IM, World Bank, and you will take-off one of their legs.
For there is nothing that the Jew fears most than the truth and losing his money.
Expose them relentlessly and strike them when it hurts the most: their assets.
It can be done by boycott, banning their media, social media, tech services from our lives as well as all the evil corporations they control.
Defenders of Palestine already do that, even though, many are on the left and pro-immigration, this is the right thing to do.
Other actions include targeting their assets in various ways, so if they target our assets then we should respond in kind.
Enthusiasts for the multicultural project often ask, why are there so many complaints about so many black faces on tv programmes and adverts. However, these people are the first to complain about the lack of black faces. Remember the black musicians who complained that they were fed up with playing to all white audiences, the black BBC radio presenter who complained that the majority of his colleagues were white. Then the women’s football team won the world cup in 2023, but they were criticised for a lack of diversity(too many white players). Then we had the comment from the odious Adjoa Andoa that the royal balcony during the coronation of King Charles was “terribly white”. The comments from Andoa are particularly ironic, considering she stars in the tv series Bridgerton, in which the aristocracy of England in the 1880s are around 65% black. Of course, if you point this out, you are smeared as a racist, but Andoa calls the all white royal balcony to white, and the white woman at her side nods her head in agreement. In 2023, restaurant owner, Ted Straker, proudly showed off his team of chefs. The problem is, they are all white and the photograph drew a storm of criticism for not being inclusive(too many white people). To make matters even worse, his restaurant, Straker’s, is situated in the diverse(very few white people), area of Golborne Road in Notting hill, west London. Notting hill, the home of the Windrush. Perhaps the most notable example of anti white hate is Humza Yousaf’s(spelt useless), notorious racist speech in the Scottish Parliament in which he pointed out that most of the senior positions in Scotland are held by people who are white. This is hardly surprising considering that Scotland is around 96% white. The Scottish police received around 3000 complaints, but hit back claiming that they were mostly from the “far right”. I don’t believe that they did much investigating, how did they know that all the complaints were from the “far right”? The police are forever telling us that they are duty bound to act on complaints, even one complaint, but in the case of ethnic minorities, they are always the victims.