September 2026 -

People who are wilfully blind

Will Wright

An unusual meeting between two very different men

Imagine a man who is an expert in subatomic physics. In his leisure hours he has made a study of Eastern mysticism. To his surprise he realises that statements about the nature of the universe, made by mystics many centuries ago, are remarkably similar to statements about the nature of the universe, made by modern scientists studying the subatomic world.

He writes a book about it, pitched at the intelligent layman. Then several others write on the same theme.

One day, he is thrown together with another man, either by fate, or some mischievous god. They are stuck in a hotel bar in bad weather.

The second man knows nothing of either subatomic physics or Eastern mysticism. He has not read the book. In fact, he does not do much reading at all, even modern novels.

The two men talk about food, beer, football, a little politics. They drink quite a few beers. But the second man asks the physicist to tell him about his book. He explains the theme, but the questioner quickly becomes bored.

Later, when someone asks the second man what he thinks about the book, he readily dismisses it as “a load of crap.” But is he really qualified to hold an opinion on this book?

Which of the two men has your sympathy?

A study of Jews

I have read quite a few books about Jews and also quite a few books by Jews. I have drawn conclusions about Jews. I have observed Jewish behaviour and discussed it with people who are also knowledgeable about Jewish people.

Sometimes, someone patriotic asks me about this. But that is often done in a busy pub, where many other topics of conversation are competing. I do not get much said.

Often, the questioner will state, “It’s not the Jews we should be bothered about, it’s the fucking Muslims,” or some variant on that idea.

If I ask someone which they care about – Pakistani rape gangs, or Black knife murders, they might look oddly at me and say, “I care about both.” I feel like that if someone asks me which is the bigger threat, Jews or Muslims. Surely, we care about both threats. And we do not need to take sides in any quarrel between Jews and Muslims, either in the Middle East, or right here in Britain.

To my dismay, I often find that people who do little reading, and have never been properly active in politics, are quick to decide that they know better than me that all the country’s problems are the fault of Muslims.

Is this situation Nick Griffin’s fault?

Increasingly harsh laws have made it dangerous to speak publicly, or write publicly, about Race. Nick Griffin, very well educated and very knowledgeable about racial problems, thought he had found a way around that problem.

As the largest immigrant group are Pakistani Muslims, Griffin concentrated the BNP’s attention on Muslims in the UK. That was a strategy, but unfortunately, a lot of people took Griffin at his word.

The BNP recruited a lot of people, but many of those people never learned racial nationalist ideology. For such people, Blacks, Chinese, Indian Sikhs and Hindus, Jews, are all okay. Only Muslims present a problem.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, the infamous ‘Tommy Robinson,’ is a political ignoramus and a petty crook. He has been promoted by the state to take British Nationalism’s proper place on the streets. For ‘Robinson’ he really believes that Muslims are the only problem. He always had a Sikh as his right-hand man.

Jewish politicians, lawyers, media types, educators, all promoted a multi-racial society for decades. Other Jews were also implicated in much violence against Nationalists. But now Jews feel threatened by the militant Islamic presence here in Britain. They expect British patriots to jump to the defence of Jews. Those Jews encourage hostility towards Muslims. ‘Tommy Robinson’ is their puppet.

Many mainstream media people also pay lip service to the idea that it is exclusively Muslims who are the problem.

Tommy’s man in Hull: John Francis

John Francis Giddins is a flamboyant former martial artist, from London. He is a former member of Tommy Robinson’s EDL. He boasts of Jewish ancestry and is supported by a Black former pub and club bouncer, Martin Morgan. John Francis, as he likes to be known, has organised yet another rally in the centre of Hull. The theme? ‘Black, Brown and White, unite!”

He claims to be against extremists of both the Right and the Left, as well as Muslim extremists and politically correct extremists. So Giddins promotes a multi-racial society and opposes the ‘far right.’ How exactly is this man a threat to the Establishment, when he follows its line?

I urge all genuine patriots in Hull, do not support this man, he is not the real deal.

Nigel Farage and Reform UK

I think that Nigel Farage was/is sincere about his opposition to British membership of the European Union. He was opposed to free movement of labour. But he is not and never has been a racial nationalist.

However, he is happy to be mistaken for one, when there are elections.

Just as ‘Tommy Robinson’ has taken British Nationalism’s place at street demonstrations, Nigel Farage has taken British Nationalism’s place at the ballot box. Nationalism has been usurped by controlled opposition.

Reform UK spokesmen have jumped on the anti-Muslim bandwagon, even though the party has several prominent Muslims in the party hierarchy. It also has other racial foreigners.

Now Reform UK has two Jewish organisations. There is a Friends of Israel group, just like the Establishment parties all have, as well as a Reform Jewish Alliance.

If Reform UK replaces the Conservative Party as the main right-wing party, voters, rank-and-file members, financial donors, and prominent politicians will all move over to Reform UK. Now Reform UK has given public and official support to the organised Jewish community. If Reform UK becomes the Government, then how can that really be described as a revolution? Reform will not even stop immigration and will never remigrate large numbers.

A big problem for Nationalists

Most superficially political people today, not only do not know about the Jewish dimension to British politics, but they also do not want to learn about it. They are much happier only being anti-Muslim.

If Pakistanis and others keep themselves apart from White society, because of Islam, they should in theory be much easier to remigrate. But the organised Jewish community would like them to renounce Islam and merge into British society – and forget about support for the Palestinians.

The Jewish opposition to Islam is not the same as British Nationalism’s desire for an all-White Britain.

© Will Wright 2026. For permission to reproduce this post please contact the author through this web site.

The coming apocalypse

Will Wright

Multi-racialism

Matt Goodwin tells us that the educated elite is about fifteen percent of the population. They went to university and received a good dose of brainwashing. Those who were from predominantly White areas mingled with non-Whites. They received both theoretical and practical instruction in multi-racialism.

It is from this educated elite that the political class is drawn. If we look closely at many non-White politicians, we notice that many of them have White spouses. While White Establishment politicians often have either a Jewish spouse, or a non-White one of some description. Many Establishment politicians have mixed-race children. Those politicians are enmeshed in the multi-racial society.

They have bought into multi-racialism and are living it. That is the elite.

Among non-elite people, in most non-White areas there are now several generations of Whites who have taken foreign partners and produced mixed-race children. Whites who have become absorbed by non-White society.

A partial awakening?

I think both among the educated elite, and among the underclass, there must be people who are beginning to realise that the multi-racial society is not working. That it is heading towards disaster. Even those enmeshed and absorbed by multi-racialism might begin to see that.

Then there is the hypocrite class. Those liberal Whites who pay lip-service to multi-racialism, but who live in predominantly White areas, and very quietly and privately like it that way. They tell working class Whites that they should accept multi-racialism.

Some of those hypocrites might be waking up too. It is difficult to admit that they have been wrong all of their adult life. They still loathe ‘the far right’ (British Nationalists) but now recognise that something needs to be done. They are just not sure what.

The nightmare

More things are very belatedly entering the public consciousness. More people know about the Pakistani rape gangs operating on an industrial scale. People are becoming aware of the growing numbers of serious crimes, every year, at the Notting Hill Carnival.

A growing number of people fear militant Islam, within our society.

The Great Replacement has now entered mainstream consciousness. That is not only about continued mass, non-White immigration, previously high levels of non-White breeding, and inter-racial breeding.

Many White people have not bred in sufficient numbers for about fifty years. Now the White population is top-heavy, it is growing old. Nick Griffin refers to this as the Demographic Winter.

A paralysed political class

Politicians who have allowed mass immigration, passed repressive ‘hate’ laws to prevent effective campaigning against mass immigration, preached Diversity, Equality and Inclusion, for evermore, and themselves inter-married with non-Whites, are now beginning to realise that the system is heading towards collapse.

Civilisation and culture are products of the White Race. When the White Race becomes a smaller and smaller minority, White civilisation and culture will recede. Slowly at first but then faster as the demographics change.

White liberal politicians of both main political parties do not, even now, have the will to prevent illegal immigration, never mind halt legal migration, never mind begin a programme of remigration. They are terrified.

A weak police force

The police were once effective. But they had to admit growing numbers of women. Then they had to admit growing numbers of racial foreigners. They had to drop the height restriction, and change standards on fitness.

Police forces were ordered to bring in more and more university graduates, at all levels. These were the people brainwashed in political correctness. On top of that, they embraced a culture of health and safety – for police officers, not the public.

Dress standards declined. It is common to see fat, unfit, bearded, tattooed, policemen lounging about in high visibility jackets, worried about their own safety.

It is hard to contact the police. People do not know non-emergency telephone numbers. It is hard to enter a police station and receive attention. There are also fewer stations. Police like driving their cars with sirens going, but they are no use outside of their cars.

Police patrol in twos. That could be two four-foot-five policewomen. Or two wimpy, small, unfit and scruffy policemen.

Experts now warn that the police could not contain very large-scale rioting, happening simultaneously in multiple cities and towns. Police officers get physically hurt or have ‘mental health issues’ and go sick for long periods.

In the 1980s, police could not prevent large-scale Black rioting, burning and looting, mostly in London but also elsewhere too. Large numbers of police officers were seriously injured, in Bradford, Oldham, and elsewhere, twenty years later, when it was the turn of the Pakistanis to riot and burn.

And the police were terrified when, two years ago, White populations across the country finally rioted over immigration.

Are we heading for a racial civil war?

Imagine if all racial groups rioted simultaneously. Imagine if a large group of armed Muslim Pakistanis confronted a large group of tough White protestors. What if both groups turned on the police?

If the modern police cannot cope and the army numbers are at a record low, then who is going to keep the peace?

Liberal politicians know this. That is why they dare not ban the Notting Hill Carnival or clamp down on Black knife murders in London. That is why they are not doing enough about the Pakistani gang-rape epidemic. Because they are terrified of Black and Pakistani muscle on the streets. They are terrified of rioting.

Nick Griffin tells us that it is highly unlikely that we will ever see a true British Nationalist government. He points out that a Reform UK government would never repatriate all the non-Whites, or even some of them. A Reform government would not even stop immigration. Griffin therefore concludes that we will never see mass remigration.

He suggests that even if remigration was to be legislated for, Blacks and Pakistanis, and others would seriously riot. The very thing that the politicians and police are most terrified of.

Troublemakers in the shadows?

Any civil war, racial or otherwise, would weaken an already weak country. As Nationalists we want our country to be stronger. We should pray that there never is a civil war.

But some people would like there to be a very bloody civil war in Britain. Some White Americans would like capable White Britons to emigrate to America. The USA faces its own demographic nightmare as well as the international threat of China. Some people want White immigration there, even if they dare not openly say so.

Zionists would like Jews living in Britain to emigrate to their hoped-for Greater Israel. Commentators from these two groups are trying to escalate trouble in our country, to satisfy their own aims. We must hope that they do not succeed.

Whites might still be seventy percent of the UK population, but some of our biggest cities are already majority non-White. We have an old White population. Within twenty years millions will have died.

If our politicians and our people are terrified of Black and Pakistani rioting now, what will things be like for White indigenous people in twenty years’ time?

It is a frightening thought, and especially for those Britons who will live to see it.

© Will Wright 2026. For permission to reproduce this post please contact the author through this web site.

Which Way Forward?

Will Wright

The history of the British extremist Left

I have always believed that in any group of people, those individuals who are most sure of themselves will influence the rest of the group. In politics, a person who is convinced that he is right will influence someone who is not sure what he really believes.

When a convinced political type is placed among people who are already halfway towards agreeing with him, the job of winning them over should be so much easier.

When the Trotskyites infiltrated the Labour Party, in the 1970s, they formed an organised group, originally called the Militant Tendency. I believe that they influenced a lot of more moderate socialists and dragged the Labour Party leftwards.

The Militant was especially effective in recruiting the Labour Party Young Socialists. From a British Nationalist perspective, Labour Party Trotskyites were largely indistinguishable from Socialist Workers Party Trotskyites.

The ‘Entryist’ Trots were so successful that Neil Kinnock (himself very left-wing) had a tough job expelling all of them from the Labour Party. Outside of Labour, they formed the Socialist Party and were never as effective again.

A second attempt

Much more recently, a campaigning group within the Labour Party, called Momentum, threw its weight behind the leadership ambitions of Jeremy Corbyn. Corbyn was always careful to insist that he was a “democratic, mainstream socialist.”

Gormless Ed Milliband had changed Labour’s internal rules, so the rank-and-file members could elect the party’s leader. Corbyn was twice elected as leader, by a big majority.

Momentum had to avoid what Militant did and not identify too closely as a party within a party. But they were successful in enthusing left-wingers inside the party. The Labour Party was dragged leftwards, from an already left-wing position.

A personal experience

In the 1980s, I worked with a member of the Militant, at the Post Office. Whenever I worked with him, he was fine and we got along okay. But we clashed at union meetings.

He would put forward a motion, that had nothing to do with the workplace – some far-Left cause, often involving donating branch funds. Trade union membership was compulsory, at that time, but only the more left-wing people actually attended union meetings.

Our Trotskyite colleague was intelligent and articulate and could easily persuade more moderate people to go along with him – until I spoke up. When a vote was taken, his motion was voted down.

After a meeting, about ten of us would go to a pub. That included the Militant and me. He usually sulked with me for the first half an hour but then came around.

This experience showed me how the extremist Left operated and succeeded.

Nigel Farage’s parties

UKIP, the Brexit Party, and currently Reform UK have all constitutionally barred the way to membership for anyone who ever belonged either the National Front, or the British National Party.

Either Farage, or someone working with him behind the scenes, recognised that authentic British Nationalists might very likely turn the rank-and-file membership Nationalist. That would be likely to happen even without an organised bloc. Because we Nationalists have an ideology, which Farage’s parties have always lacked.

Farage clashed with UKIP’s National Committee and so he wanted to rule the party as a dictator. When that could not happen, he left to start another party.

Both before and afterwards, Farage has always driven out those who disagree with him, as well as anyone who appears to have an independent charisma of their own.

When Farage did that with Rupert Lowe, Lowe created his own party and had a success that surprised Farage. Restore Britain was born.

The opportunist mind of Nick Griffin

Nigel Farage had boasted to Establishment figures and the mainstream media that he was the bulwark against ‘far right extremism.’ He claimed that his presence in British politics destroyed the BNP. When Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons entered a Brussels bar that Farage’s MEPs frequented, Farage boasts that he had them thrown out.

Rupert Lowe complicated the picture. Restore Britain did NOT ban British Nationalists from membership. Nick Griffin quickly spotted that.

In his Substack column, Griffin stated that ALL British Nationalists should now join Restore Britain. Nationalists are very thin on the ground these days. But some followed Griffin’s suggestion and did join Restore Britain.

Others decided to do that quite independently of Griffin, people who are not fans of his. I am told that included Steve Laws of Remigration Now.

Griffin believes that the patriotic cause cannot succeed electorally. But he also thinks that British Nationalists could influence and eventually recruit Restore Britain’s members for the community-building work which Griffin believes will become necessary for White survival.

I think Griffin is right that ideological Nationalists could and should influence Restore Britain’s rank-and-file. Griffin points out that Restore Britain’s membership is ten times the strength of the BNP’s membership at its peak.

I think that both Reform UK’s and Restore Britain’s rank-and-file members are closer to us than to their own leaders.

In the era of internet influencers and online booksellers, any party which does not have an ideology is open to influence from people who do have an ideology and clear aims.

Can two strategies both work at the same time?

Nick Griffin is not the only prolific Nationalist writer on Substack. His former protégé, Mark Collett, writes there too.

I now think that Collett has matured into a good Nationalist. He is now a middle-aged married man and a father. He has had other ‘mentors’ since he parted company with Griffin.

Collett too has been observing Reform UK and Restore Britain. Collett, like Griffin, now appears to think that Nationalist efforts at elections are futile. But unlike Griffin, he has not abandoned hope of remigration.

Collett thinks that Nationalists should want a Reform UK general election victory. But why? He believes that would destroy the Conservative Party. I am not sure without re-reading him whether he also believes that Labour could go into terminal decline too.

Collet states that the two main parties have been entrenched for a century, but Reform UK would have much shallower roots, if ever a real Nationalist revival takes place.

I do not disagree with Mark Collett, in principle. Both main parties certainly deserve to die.

But if Reform UK is to win, that would need Restore Britain to disappear. Either to merge with Reform UK or have a pact. That thinking puts Collett up against some of his colleagues in the Patriotic Alliance. Those following Griffin’s entryist strategy with Restore Britain.

Could Griffin’s and others’ ‘entryist’ strategy with Restore Britain work in tandem with hoping for a Reform UK government? It seems unlikely. That puts me in a quandary.

It depends on whether you think Reform UK could actually win a general election and whether you believe that is desirable. It is far less likely to happen if Rupert Lowe’s Restore Britain takes say 10 percent of the votes, that would otherwise have gone to Farage and Reform UK.

If we were to believe that instead of Reform UK, Restore Britain could win a general election, then we should support them. But no one believes Restore Britain could do that.

Are both Griffin and Collett right? Or are they both wrong? Or should we choose one strategy over the other?

Copyright (c) 2026 Will Wright. For permission to reproduce this post please contact the author through this web site.