People who are wilfully blind

Will Wright

An unusual meeting between two very different men

Imagine a man who is an expert in subatomic physics. In his leisure hours he has made a study of Eastern mysticism. To his surprise he realises that statements about the nature of the universe, made by mystics many centuries ago, are remarkably similar to statements about the nature of the universe, made by modern scientists studying the subatomic world.

He writes a book about it, pitched at the intelligent layman. Then several others write on the same theme.

One day, he is thrown together with another man, either by fate, or some mischievous god. They are stuck in a hotel bar in bad weather.

The second man knows nothing of either subatomic physics or Eastern mysticism. He has not read the book. In fact, he does not do much reading at all, even modern novels.

The two men talk about food, beer, football, a little politics. They drink quite a few beers. But the second man asks the physicist to tell him about his book. He explains the theme, but the questioner quickly becomes bored.

Later, when someone asks the second man what he thinks about the book, he readily dismisses it as “a load of crap.” But is he really qualified to hold an opinion on this book?

Which of the two men has your sympathy?

A study of Jews

I have read quite a few books about Jews and also quite a few books by Jews. I have drawn conclusions about Jews. I have observed Jewish behaviour and discussed it with people who are also knowledgeable about Jewish people.

Sometimes, someone patriotic asks me about this. But that is often done in a busy pub, where many other topics of conversation are competing. I do not get much said.

Often, the questioner will state, “It’s not the Jews we should be bothered about, it’s the fucking Muslims,” or some variant on that idea.

If I ask someone which they care about – Pakistani rape gangs, or Black knife murders, they might look oddly at me and say, “I care about both.” I feel like that if someone asks me which is the bigger threat, Jews or Muslims. Surely, we care about both threats. And we do not need to take sides in any quarrel between Jews and Muslims, either in the Middle East, or right here in Britain.

To my dismay, I often find that people who do little reading, and have never been properly active in politics, are quick to decide that they know better than me that all the country’s problems are the fault of Muslims.

Is this situation Nick Griffin’s fault?

Increasingly harsh laws have made it dangerous to speak publicly, or write publicly, about Race. Nick Griffin, very well educated and very knowledgeable about racial problems, thought he had found a way around that problem.

As the largest immigrant group are Pakistani Muslims, Griffin concentrated the BNP’s attention on Muslims in the UK. That was a strategy, but unfortunately, a lot of people took Griffin at his word.

The BNP recruited a lot of people, but many of those people never learned racial nationalist ideology. For such people, Blacks, Chinese, Indian Sikhs and Hindus, Jews, are all okay. Only Muslims present a problem.

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, the infamous ‘Tommy Robinson,’ is a political ignoramus and a petty crook. He has been promoted by the state to take British Nationalism’s proper place on the streets. For ‘Robinson’ he really believes that Muslims are the only problem. He always had a Sikh as his right-hand man.

Jewish politicians, lawyers, media types, educators, all promoted a multi-racial society for decades. Other Jews were also implicated in much violence against Nationalists. But now Jews feel threatened by the militant Islamic presence here in Britain. They expect British patriots to jump to the defence of Jews. Those Jews encourage hostility towards Muslims. ‘Tommy Robinson’ is their puppet.

Many mainstream media people also pay lip service to the idea that it is exclusively Muslims who are the problem.

Tommy’s man in Hull: John Francis

John Francis Giddins is a flamboyant former martial artist, from London. He is a former member of Tommy Robinson’s EDL. He boasts of Jewish ancestry and is supported by a Black former pub and club bouncer, Martin Morgan. John Francis, as he likes to be known, has organised yet another rally in the centre of Hull. The theme? ‘Black, Brown and White, unite!”

He claims to be against extremists of both the Right and the Left, as well as Muslim extremists and politically correct extremists. So Giddins promotes a multi-racial society and opposes the ‘far right.’ How exactly is this man a threat to the Establishment, when he follows its line?

I urge all genuine patriots in Hull, do not support this man, he is not the real deal.

Nigel Farage and Reform UK

I think that Nigel Farage was/is sincere about his opposition to British membership of the European Union. He was opposed to free movement of labour. But he is not and never has been a racial nationalist.

However, he is happy to be mistaken for one, when there are elections.

Just as ‘Tommy Robinson’ has taken British Nationalism’s place at street demonstrations, Nigel Farage has taken British Nationalism’s place at the ballot box. Nationalism has been usurped by controlled opposition.

Reform UK spokesmen have jumped on the anti-Muslim bandwagon, even though the party has several prominent Muslims in the party hierarchy. It also has other racial foreigners.

Now Reform UK has two Jewish organisations. There is a Friends of Israel group, just like the Establishment parties all have, as well as a Reform Jewish Alliance.

If Reform UK replaces the Conservative Party as the main right-wing party, voters, rank-and-file members, financial donors, and prominent politicians will all move over to Reform UK. Now Reform UK has given public and official support to the organised Jewish community. If Reform UK becomes the Government, then how can that really be described as a revolution? Reform will not even stop immigration and will never remigrate large numbers.

A big problem for Nationalists

Most superficially political people today, not only do not know about the Jewish dimension to British politics, but they also do not want to learn about it. They are much happier only being anti-Muslim.

If Pakistanis and others keep themselves apart from White society, because of Islam, they should in theory be much easier to remigrate. But the organised Jewish community would like them to renounce Islam and merge into British society – and forget about support for the Palestinians.

The Jewish opposition to Islam is not the same as British Nationalism’s desire for an all-White Britain.

© Will Wright 2026. For permission to reproduce this post please contact the author through this web site.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RSS
Follow by Email