Editorâ€™s note: This is the third in a brilliant three-part sequence first published by The Occidental Observer on Wednesday 15th July 2020 at https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2020/07/15/secure-tolerance-the-jewish-plan-to-permanently-silence-the-west-part-3-of-3
2018-2020: Big Tech/ Big Capital/ Big Jew/ Big Brother
A key step towards making dissident thought unlawful, and ensuring â€œSecure Toleranceâ€, is the effort to represent it, in its totality, as culturally illicit. As early as 2015, Brian Marcus, head of the ADLâ€™s Internet Division, had been contacting Internet Service Providers (ISPs) with threats that allowing â€œhateâ€ material on their service â€œwould be bad for their businessâ€.
Backed with reports, policy proposals, and â€œrecommendationsâ€ from their own alphabet soup of think tanks and solo Jewish intellectuals like Cohen-Almagor, the ADL and the European Jewish Congress began more widespread intensive lobbying of tech companies in late 2018. The acceleration of lobbying against Big Tech should be seen in the broader context of heightened activism for the implementation of â€œSecure Toleranceâ€ more generally.
Although the ADL and YouTube had co-operated since at least 2008, intensification of this relationship in early 2019 culminated in YouTube changing its content policy. Jonathan Greenblatt announced the ADL had been
â€œworking with technology companies, including YouTube, to aggressively counter hate on their platforms. We were glad to share our expertise on this and look forward to continuing to provide input. While this is an important step forward, this move alone is insufficient and must be followed by many more changes from YouTube and other tech companies to adequately counter the scourge of online hate and extremismâ€.
The international Jewish strategy to bring the ethos of â€œsecure toleranceâ€ into tech culture again involved the high-level involvement of American Jewish groups in Europeâ€™s â€œdemocraticâ€ institutions.
For example, in May 2015 the American Jewish Committeeâ€™s Transatlantic Institute (note again this constant reliance on a motley of Jewish â€˜think tanksâ€™), launched a fervent lobbying campaign at the EU with the aim to â€œdetoxify social media. â€¦ Internet Service Providers are free to â€” and should â€” exclude raw hate speechâ€.
Just to make sure the message was sent loud and clear, the AJC even hosted its main 2015 â€œStrategy Conference on Combating Anti-Semitismâ€ in Brussels, during which the â€œAJC unveiled an action plan for European governments to address the intensifying crisis of anti-Semitismâ€.
This, then, is our â€œdemocracyâ€ â€” unelected, uninvited American Jewish groups presenting â€œaction plansâ€ (lists of demands) to a bloated, corrupt, and unaccountable bureaucracy.
* * *
Britainâ€™s Jewish â€œCommunity Security Trustâ€ (CST) has, since 2016, been working, again in an unelected and unaccountable capacity, with the European Commission on a â€œsocial media illegal hate speech monitoringâ€ project. The CST was able to use the semblance of official authority given to it by this alliance to pressure social media companies by sending them regular performance reports on how well they were doing in removing CST-blacklisted speech from Twitter, Facebook and Google.
In yet another stellar example of democracy in action, the unelected and unaccountable CST had earlier claimed the credit for developing â€œthe EU Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech onlineâ€. The code was imposed on Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Google+, Snapchat, Dailymotion, and Jeuxvideo.com, following the CSTâ€™s accusation that they were â€œnot adhering to anti-hate speech laws across Europeâ€.
The EU Code of Conduct, however, was only ever intended as the first step towards â€œsecure toleranceâ€, and Moshe Kantor remarked in one 2017 interview that, in his opinion, Big Tech was failing even to meet the basic Jewish expectations of the Code (removal of the majority of designated material within 24 hours).
In a 2017 article for Britainâ€™s Independent, Kantor insisted â€œwe must now look to European political leaders to take stronger action, using legislation if necessary, to prove theyâ€™re serious about combating this problem once and for allâ€. [emphasis added]
The broader push was always for heightened legal measures that would involve law enforcement, as Kantor had himself spelled out in his 2011 Manifesto. Incessant Jewish lobbying has resulted in Germany being the first nation to take the next step to â€œsecure toleranceâ€. Recently, Germany adopted Raphael Cohen-Almagorâ€™s proposal that â€œracismâ€ be treated in the same way as terrorism and child pornography. In February 2020, the German government approved a bill to â€œforce social networks such as Facebook and Twitter to report criminal posts to the policeâ€.
The Financial Times reports:
â€œUnder the planned new law, which is the toughest of its kind in the world, social media platforms will not only have to delete certain kinds of hate speech but also flag the content to the Office of the Federal Criminal Police (BKA). Posts that companies will be required to report include those indicating preparations for a terrorist attack and the formation of criminal and terrorist groups, as well as those featuring instances of racial incitement and the distribution of child pornography. The networks would also have to give the BKA the last IP address and port number most recently assigned to the user profile.â€[emphasis added]
Early resistance from Facebook to the legislation, focused specifically on the issue of â€œHolocaust denialâ€ prompted the ADL to go into attack mode. Reverting to tactics once used against Henry Fordâ€™s Dearborn Independent, the ADL dropped its â€œBoycott is not a solutionâ€ rhetoric that had been employed against the BDS movement, and initiated a â€œStop Hate for Profitâ€ advertising boycott in early June by circulating images showing advertisers anti-Jewish (really, often simply anti-George Soros) Facebook posts alongside which their ads were running. The move shaved almost $58 billion from Facebookâ€™s stock value, with over 1,000 major companies leveraged into action.
ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblattâ€™s series of demands to drop the boycott include the granting of high-level access to â€œcivil rightsâ€ (ADL) officials who will perform â€œregular, independent auditsâ€ of â€œhateâ€ on the platform (which would allow them to engage in intelligence gathering, the collection of IP addresses etc.), immediate removal of â€œthousandsâ€ of White advocacy groups, and the use of Facebook software to â€œtargetâ€ â€œneo-Nazis and White supremacistsâ€.
Simultaneously, the ADL and Moshe Kantor have been pushing a Holocaust-narrative marketing campaign on Facebook, Instagram, and elsewhere, with Kantor commenting â€œThe best way to spread any message today is through social media.â€ Censorship and propaganda thus go hand-in-hand in the effort to gain a monopoly of the public mind.
As the worldâ€™s largest and most influential Jewish organizations tighten their hold on Big Techâ€™s conglomerates, smaller rivals have emerged to fill the dissident demand for platforms. One of the most promising of these is BitChute, a UK-registered technology company with British directors. Slick and easy to navigate, the site is an obvious alternative to those exiled from YouTube, and its growing popularity has frustrated Jews whose goal isnâ€™t simply to remove dissident speech from the larger platforms, but to remove it from the internet, and the public sphere, forever.
Two weeks ago, the CST produced a maudlin propaganda video denouncing BitChute and presenting all dissident thought as â€œincitement to murderâ€. In the course of the video, CST staff announce theyâ€™ve been gathering intelligence at the site and will submit a â€œreportâ€ to their â€œpartners in government, anti-terrorism police, and in think tanksâ€. [emphasis added] The CST has also been concentrating its efforts on Gab, 4chan, and Telegram, and CST Chief Executive Mark Gardner claims that â€œcontact with the policeâ€ has already led to the removal of some content.
The CST recently secured another UK government grant of Â£14 million ($17.66 million), which it has been receiving annually since 2015. In fact, the group is so financially secure that it is now hiring â€œsocial media research analystsâ€ so that it can better put pressure on the government to introduce legislation preventing free speech on the internet. Given that young British people are dying of cancer because the NHS claims to be unable to afford the necessary drugs, it must be a great comfort to their families that at least some Jews, somewhere, are collecting large salaries to browse memes on Twitter and send regular reports to the police about the hate theyâ€™ve found on Gab.
While BitChute has very low advertising revenue, and is thus relatively immune to boycott tactics, Jewish groups have nevertheless attempted to attack other parts of the siteâ€™s infrastructure. In particular, the siteâ€™s reliance on Disqus for video comments has been highlighted as a potential means of weakening the site, with Garner declaring â€œDisqus is part of this problemâ€. One presumes that a warning has been sent.
Online payment processors are another element of internet infrastructure that has been relentlessly attacked by organized Jews. Eric Strikerâ€™s National Justice recently revealed images from a private PayPal seminar in which audience members were told that â€œhate contentâ€ was referred to the ADL, among other â€œexternal partners.â€
â€œAccording to another training slide,1800 accounts belonging to individuals, non-profits and businesses in the last year have been eliminated for political reasons using guidelines provided by their â€˜partnersâ€™. 65% were for what they categorize as white nationalist activity, while the next most censored group is people and organizations who advocate for immigration restrictions. A person cannot support Donald Trumpâ€™s winning issue from his 2016 campaign and still keep their Paypal, in other words. There is even a category for â€˜prejudiced academic workâ€™.â€
PayPal CEO Dan Schulman is himself Jewish, and itâ€™s hard not to conclude that this was a very willing partnership. In fact, Jewish activism in Big Tech collides with another phenomenon â€” what Aaron Chatterji and Michael Toffel refer to in the Harvard Business Review as â€œThe New CEO Activists.â€
Chatterji and Toffel cite Schulmanâ€™s decision not to locate PayPal infrastructure in Charlotte, North Carolina, as CEO activist economic punishment for the stateâ€™s legislation banning the gender-confused from using the bathrooms of the opposite sex. The Associated Press estimated that an ensuing boycott of North Carolina by heavily-Jewish Big Capital cost the state more than $3.76 billion. Salesforceâ€™s Marc Benioff and Goldmans Sachsâ€™s Lloyd Blankfein were similarly listed as â€œCEO activistsâ€ in the cause of advancing homosexuals and their culture.
Financial support to Jewish groups and associated â€œthink tanksâ€ and legal institutions is another crucial aspect of CEO activism. Logan Green, Jewish CEO of car-sharing company Lyft, pledged $1 million to the American Civil Liberties Union when the ACLU was preparing to fight Donald Trumpâ€™s early attempt at an immigration ban. The ADL has received huge donations from most of the big names in Big Capital and Big Tech. For all the current theater about Facebookâ€™s insistence on some modicum of free speech, Facebook CEO Sheryl Sandberg last year made a personal donation of $2.5 million to the ADL. This can be added to $1 million from Apple, $1 million from Fox, and $1 million from Jewish Craigslist founder Craig Newmark for the specific purpose of fighting â€œonline hate speech.â€
That the ADL has been able to mobilize a massive and crushing boycott of Facebook is as much a â€œshow of strengthâ€, an act of intimidation against broader industry, government, and people, as it is a specific act against Facebookâ€™s sluggishness in imposing the full list of measures demanded by Big Jew. So-called CEO activism is so very useful to the ADL because so many of the CEOâ€™s are themselves Jewish and highly supportive of the cause. As Fenek Solere pointed out in a recent article for Britainâ€™s Patriotic Alternative, it is almost impossible to separate Big Tech and Big Capital from Big Jew:
Public broadcasting networks both in the UK and USA are â€” and have been for many years â€” effectively owned and dominated by people like
- Sumner Redstone,
- Phillipe Dauman,
- Bernard Delfont,
- Lew and Leslie Grade and
- Alan Yentob.
But it is not only in the spheres of global communication, financial services and party political funding where people like â€¦
- Julian A. Brodsky, of Comcast,
- Michael Dell of Dell,
- Sandy Lerner, co-founder Cisco systems,
- Robert A. Altman of ZeniMax Media,
- Sergey Brin and Larry Page of Google,
- Susan Wojcicki at YouTube,
- Sheryl Sandberg, CEO of Facebook,
- Aaron Swartz of Reddit,
- Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook,
- Jeff Weimar at LinkedIn,
- Max Levchin of PayPal,
- Charles Schusterman of Samson Investment,
- Richard and Henry Bloch of the Tax Preparation Company,
- The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, J Street,
- The Zionist Organization of America,
- The Republican Jewish Coalition,
- and the Christians United for Israel,
â€¦ hold sway.
Some other areas in which they are disproportionately over-represented are:
- governmental bureaucracies,
- hotel and leisure,
- theatre and the arts,
- technology and software,
- international intelligence services,
- charities and NGOs,
- healthcare, professional consultancy
- and the legal and judicial profession.
Representative examples being:
- Devin Wenig of eBay,
- Mark Weinberger CEO/Chairman of Ernst & Young,
- Samuel Ruben, Duracell Inc,
- Bernard L. Schwartz, CEO of Loral Space & Communication Inc,
- Rachel Haurwitz, co-founder of Gene Editing and Caribou Biosciences,
- Leonard Schleifer, founder of biotechnology Regeneron Pharmaceuticals,
- Beny Alagem, founder of Packard Bell,
- Amir Ashkenazi, co-founder of Adap. TV and Shopping.com,
- Jay Cohen of Online Gambling,
- Talman Marco of Viber,
- Sean Pad of Tinder,
- Henry Crown, founder of the Material Service Corporation in Aeronautics,
- the Mossad run ICTS Europe specialising in international Security,
- Gumar Agujar and Armand Hammer of Occidental Petroleum,
- Arthur Belfer of Belco Petroleum, precursor to the infamous Enron organisation,
- Louis Blaustien of American Oil,
- Leon Hess of the Hess Corporation, owners of the NFLâ€™s New York Jets, C,
- Morris Mirkin of Budget Rent-a-Car,
- Sheldon Yellen of Belfor Construction,
- Leonard Abramson of Health Maintenance Organization,
- Bennett Greenspan of Gene testing,
- Joel Landau of Allure,
- Martine Rothblatt of United Therapeutics,
- Steve Ballmer of Microsoft,
- Ben Rosen of Compaq Computers,
- Ivan Seidenberg of Verizon Communications,
- Ed Savitz owner of Amusement Arcades,
- and Jonathan Tisch, CEO of Loews Hotels.
The above listing is a mere indication of how prolific these power-brokers are and the degree of control they exert over our lives every single day. â€¦ All of them are committed Zionists and all of them are members and supporters of fanatically pro-Israel, Jewish partisan organizations.
And, as I wrote at the conclusion of my 2019 essay â€œThe Necessity of anti-Semitismâ€:
â€œToday, largely worthless â€˜brandedâ€™ consumer products are overwhelmingly Jewish, are promoted via Jewish dominance of the advertising industry, and their purchase by consumers is funded by Jewish financiers.
â€œâ€¦ Calvin Klein, Levi Strauss, Ralph Lauren, Michael Kors, Kenneth Cole, Max Factor, EstÃ©e Lauder, and Marc Jacobs â€¦
â€œâ€¦ are just some of the Jews whose very names have become synonymous with debt-fueled consumer culture and the subscribing to carefully cultivated fashion fads, while Jewish-owned companies like â€¦
â€œâ€¦ Starbucks, Macyâ€™s, the Gap, American Apparel, Costco, Staples, Home Depot, Ben & Jerryâ€™s, Timberland, Snapple, HÃ¤agen-Dazs, Dunkinâ€™ Donuts, Monster Beverages, Mattel, and Toys â€˜Râ€™ Us â€¦
â€œâ€¦ have come to epitomize the endless and superfluous production of garbage for mass consumption on credit. The consuming temple of debt-fueled consumerism is also linked to the cultures of Critique, Tolerance, and Sterility. So-called anti-racism, support for gender confusion, and the celebration of mass migration and multiculturalism have become mainstays of modern advertising as the Racial Endgame nears its conclusion and the West commences its death rattle.
â€œYou might ask, when you see rainbow-package Doritos, what tortilla chips have to do with sodomy, but thatâ€™s only because youâ€™re suffering from a tolerance deficiency, and the best way to correct that is to admit White privilege, buy a Starbucks, and go try on a new pair of $200 jeans at Macyâ€™s. Critique, Tolerance, Sterility and Usury have converged. This is the necessity of anti-Semitism.â€
In light of all that has been discussed, we could add that â€œSecure Toleranceâ€, Big Tech, Big Capital, Big Brother, and Big Jew have converged. The final result will be the achievement of Jewish censorship across the West, a â€œpermanent and irreversibleâ€ cycle of laws and repression, and the theft of our childrenâ€™s future. Like Miltonâ€™s Satan, these groups will declaim in favor of equality and democracy, only to later wield the tyrantâ€™s scepter in Hell.
How to finish such a pessimistic essay? Itâ€™s true that the information presented here is disturbing, infuriating, confusing, and heartbreaking. Can any practical lessons be derived from it?
One clear pattern observed in this essay is the overwhelming reliance on â€œthink tanksâ€ and similar bureaucratic vehicles for the intrusion of harmful Jewish influence into our â€œdemocracyâ€. Jews, even with their very significant financial power, rely on the magnification of their rhetoric, interests, and grievances through such bodies in order to accomplish their goals. This is where they can and should be challenged.
Who is granting access and power to these groups? Can existing legislation be used to prevent the intrusion of these bodies into the democratic process and, if not, can new legislation be proposed to do so? The closest the dissident right ever came to a think tank was the National Policy Institute (NPI), which despite its name, and while fulfilling an important movement function, didnâ€™t really produce any policies.
At the present time, our movement clearly needs talented legal minds and institutions to unpack existing legislation, and develop new legislative proposals that, even if not explicitly racial, can seriously hinder the movement of harmful Jewish groups through the political body of the West. There is a serious lack of infrastructure of even the most basic kind, and we simply arenâ€™t going to make any progress until this problem is addressed.
The second lesson from this survey of developments is that social media is likely to become an increasingly compromised and dangerous place for activists. In Europe, new laws are probably a few years away, but the broader plan will almost certainly eventually envelop Canada, Australia, and, despite apparent belief that the Constitution is invulnerable, even the United States. Already American legal scholars have developed arguments for curtailing the First Amendment in the case of â€œhate speechâ€ (see, e.g., Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012), and it is widely believed that a liberal Supreme Court majority would adopt such reasoning.
The clock is probably already ticking on internet anonymity, and the example of Germany indicates that direct police involvement in â€œspeech crimeâ€ is on the horizon. Off-line activist methodologies should be increasingly explored. Failing that, radically alternative modes of using internet networking should be considered. For example, even if someone uses a completely outrageous Twitter handle, complete with comic book avatar, most people still have their entire lives online (job, home town, friends, likes, hobbies, vacations). Donâ€™t forget who ultimately has all of this information, and the organizations that will increasingly be able to access it.
Itâ€™s becoming very apparent that social media is itself a form of social control. We now have the ability to identify someone in a crowd simply by cross-referencing a photo of their face with available internet information. In seconds they can be identified, their employer can be contacted, and their loved ones can be harassed. In a strange way, despite the atomized condition of postmodernity, we have social control levels approaching those of the middle ages. We have new forms of social shaming, and new forms of the public pillory.
Dissident activists who face overwhelming costs if they are doxxed would be well-advised to reduce their internet presence to the bare minimum, in effect, deliberately fading themselves into obscurity, thus making their life harder for the Zionist-Globalist panopticon to search for and penetrate. Remember who you were before you became an employee number, a Facebook profile, or a Twitter handle, and protect that person like youâ€™d protect your child or other loved ones.
For the time being, however, ongoing online activism should be continued with enthusiasm and without despair. This costs our opponents dearly in terms of effort, money, and worry. Each new platform presents difficulties for them to navigate, and delays other plans they may have. Be proud that youâ€™re still active, and be proud that while so many others in life are merely counting passes, you spotted that gorilla.
Iâ€™ll leave the final word to Sir Oswald Mosley:
â€œWe have believed in our fellow Europeans. And we have believed in the destiny of Europe. My friends, itâ€™s all there, itâ€™s all waiting. Of course it can be done. It depends upon ourselves. You say, â€˜But again, weâ€™re scattered individuals. â€¦ Everythingâ€™s against us. Governments. Money. Press. Television. All the new forces are used against us. All the great forces, all the material powers of the world, you say are against you.â€™ And so they are â€” youâ€™re quite right to feel that. And I donâ€™t underrate them.
â€œBut I donâ€™t despair, and you shouldnâ€™t despair. Because you, like I, have read something of history. You know something of the record of the achievement of Europeans. And dark as this hour is, itâ€™s no darker, itâ€™s not as dark, as some of the hours youâ€™ve known in European history. When everything was cowardice, treachery, and betrayal, and when the Saracen hordes from far outside Europe swept right across that continent, small bands of men came together in resolution, in absolute determination, giving themselves completely, and saying: â€˜Europe shall live!â€™
â€œAnd they stood firm, and faced the menace to Europe, its values, its civilisations, the glory of its achievements. And more and more rallied to their standards, and those hordes were thrown back, again and again and again.
â€œMy friends itâ€™s an immense responsibility. Youâ€™re living in a historic hour â€” do remember that always. Live in that sense, I beg of you, of history and of destiny.â€
Come together, get going, get working. Inspire other people like yourselves.
 R. Cohen-Almagor, Confronting the Internetâ€™s Dark Side, (Cambridge University Press, 2015) 219.